I have been debating what the best approach is to deal with this issue.
Part of me says Donald should skip the next two debates.
Part of me says he can play the victim and let the biased and fixed debates continue, and then comment on them later.
Part of me says he should blast away at the commentator and Hillary.
There are advantages and disadvantages to each approach.
At a minimum he should feel no obligation to “play by the rules” and answer the question as asked or followup as asked.
He should make the points he wants to make regardless of what the moderator or Hillary says or does.
If he is interrupted he should just say “I am new to this politics business, and the public has a right to hear what I have to say. Please stop interrupting me when I am speaking.”
It’s really not that hard. He could learn to do it but it takes practice. Block and deflect. Every question Holt asked him the other night could have been blocked and then deflected onto Clinton.
Knowing the debates aren’t fair he should learn to do it.
The best answer is for trump to be Trump in the next debates.
I would not presume to give him any advice. He beat 16 of the top GOP in the primaries, and HilLIARy had to cheat to beat an old stupid communist.
I do WISH he would throw the book at her, but I expect he knows what he is doing.
He can’t skip the debates; Trump fears no battlefield.
He can’t play the victim; that’s for pussies.
He can and should blast when appropriate; but his main job is to represent himself and the American people.
He should walk over to Hellary’s podium and announce to the audience he’s checking it for the cheater devices she used at the first debate.
Stop talking about what he’s done in business and focus on the country.
Learn the Southern art of insults. Go for the jugular while smiling sweetly.