Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Manuka honey could fight off deadly infections in hospital equipment
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 27 September 2016 | Henry Bodkin

Posted on 09/28/2016 6:34:34 PM PDT by Lorianne

Manuka honey could be a powerful new weapon in the battle against hospital-acquired infections, scientists have revealed.

Researchers at Southampton University found that cleansing medical equipment with solutions derived from the Australia and New Zealand-based honey reduced the ability of potentially deadly bacteria to accumulate on surfaces by more than 75 per cent.

The discovery could transform safety for groups at particular risk of bacterial infections, such as the one-in-four hospital inpatients who use a catheter, thousands of whom suffer urinary-tract and other infections each year.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: editor-surveyor

That’s interesting. I hadn’t heard that.
Is there a good source of it?


41 posted on 09/28/2016 8:45:39 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

.
North American Spice and Herb.

Search “P73 oregano”
.


42 posted on 09/28/2016 8:48:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

What bizarre timing. I was reading a novel tonight about a WWII sailor who ended up on an island in the pacific after his ship was torpedoed. He had a skull fracture. An Australian woman who lived on the island treated it with honey because she said bacteria doesn’t grow under honey. Made sense then I see this article.


43 posted on 09/28/2016 8:49:16 PM PDT by cyclotic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyclotic
I was reading a novel tonight about a WWII sailor [...]

Title of that novel?

Regards,

44 posted on 09/28/2016 9:26:05 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

I has a higher viscosity because of the proteins.


45 posted on 09/28/2016 10:20:32 PM PDT by gattaca (Republicans believe every day is July 4, democrats believe every day is April 15. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

>>Bees pollinate the manuka plant the resultant honey has chemicals that are not found in regular honey.<<

I’m a beekeeper and I’m not believing the Manuka honey claim.

#1. ALL raw honey is naturally antibacterial, antimicrobial, and antifungal. Because of this, it never spoils. Honey found in Pharaoh’s tombs was crystallized, but edible and could be liquified by low temp heating. It was used and stored for more than a source of food. It was used to dress wounds, made into elixirs, used in embalming, cosmetics, etc. Of course they didn’t understand the bacteria or microbes that caused gangrene or caused a dead body to putrify. They just learned that honey would prevent it.

#2. Only the honeybee knows what variety of plant nectar and pollen they have collected that day. More importantly, the beekeeper has a difficult time limiting the bees to a single plant source. Unless the bees are provided with only one plant source within about a 2 mile radius, there’s no way to honestly claim it is 100% specialty honey and doesn’t contain nectar from other plants/trees/weeds that are interspersed withe the main crop (i.e. manuka, clover, blackberry, maple etc.).

3. Honeybees cannot survive on a single source of nectar and pollen. All plants produce pollen and nectar for a very short period of time. When the manuka or the clover is done blooming they must move on to another variety of plant that is in bloom to produce enough honey to feed their hive and to store enough honey to get them through months when there is no nectar or pollen to collect.

The idea of honey being exclusively made from a single plant source is simply not possible. We’re not sure how it happens, but research has shown that honeybees will set out at the beginning of the day to collect a specific nectar and they do that to the exclusion of all other plants in their flight path. What’s interesting is that some bees may collect only clover nectar, while others are tasked with collecting dandelion nectar, and still others are sent to collect nectar from tomato plants. All that nectar comes back and is co-mingled to produce honey. During a major nectar flow of, say, manuka, most of the bees may be collecting that nectar, but not all of them.

Beekeeping is a fascinating hobby that still holds some mysteries. One thing that isn’t a mystery, however, is that no beekeeper can claim the honey from their bees is 100% of a single plant variety.


46 posted on 09/28/2016 10:38:18 PM PDT by torqemada (If you can't accept my values, you can't have my money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek

The Commodore. PJ Duterman


47 posted on 09/29/2016 4:54:20 AM PDT by cyclotic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: torqemada

The Manuka honey people are not claiming 100% from the manuka plant. They actually give tested percentages of the compound that is dreived from the manuka plant, indicating the bees get nectar from other sources. Price is dictated by the %.

I also raised bees at one time. The majority of my honey came from blackberries. Probably a smidgeon of tansy and lotus major. I found it superior in taste to predominantly clover honey. One twenty year old gallon jug never crystalized and still retained the wonderful taste.


48 posted on 09/29/2016 7:48:00 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Thank you for that info. Incredible it isn’t commonly used, so many disfiguring burns could be named with slippery elm.


49 posted on 09/29/2016 9:46:19 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

.
Nothing natural that works well is commonly used!
.


50 posted on 09/29/2016 9:52:04 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

No, because if it can’t be patented, it makes no money.


51 posted on 09/29/2016 9:56:26 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

“I did a search ...”

Of the propaganda websites?


52 posted on 09/29/2016 4:57:40 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

No. Lots of info from my search engine

Try webmd.com for a basic non technical overview


53 posted on 09/29/2016 6:37:56 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

On WebMD they say to use a bandaid ...


54 posted on 09/29/2016 6:46:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson