I have to admit, call me a Pollyanna, I NEVER expected I would ever hear the head of the FBI refuse to refer an individual for a criminal offense based upon his belief they could not show intent when intent was not part of the statute to begin with and wherein there was ample evidence, if they looked, to show she was as culpable as Al Capone was for his crime. Perhaps the esteemed head of the FBI was asleep during the class that dealt with indirect ways to show intent. Furthermore, he obviously was asleep when how to conduct subject interviews was discussed because he missed one very basic point, the interviewer sets the interview stage. The subject can decline to be interviewed which is their right to not say anything but as he should know if he was not asleep during how to conduct a grand jury probe, he would know that taking the fifth can be used as an indication of guilty mind in GRAND JURY PROCEDINGS (obviously not at trial).
This guy fell on his sword for this POS and for the entire administration for whatever reason one can only surmise. He is either mentally defective, an obsequious personality, a total incompetent or sinister or perhaps all of them.
I'm with you Mouton... never thought I'd see this either...