Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump pledges ‘extremely rough’ attacks on Clinton over husband Bill’s AFFAIRS in debate
Express-UK ^ | September 28, 2016 | Charlie Bayliss

Posted on 09/28/2016 5:26:05 AM PDT by kevcol

Donaldf Trump has warned he is willing to unleash “extremely rough” personal attacks on Hillary Clinton in the next Presidential debate.

The Republican hopeful said he came close to exploiting Bill Clinton’s previous sex scandals but chose not to because the Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea, was in attendance.
.
.
Following the debate, Hillary Clinton’s official Twitter account released a short video of the Venezuelan model detailing the reported abuse she allegedly suffered at the hands of Trump

(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016debates; 2016elections; hillary; trump; trumpbillclinton; trumphillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: kevcol

Bill ain’t runnin’ for office.

If you want to attack Hillary! as a serial rapist’s enabler, or his accessory, that is fine. But attacking Bill Clinton is a waste of time or even counter productive.

A lot people, ‘Pubbie and Democrat, remember the Clinton administration pretty fondly, unfortunately.


61 posted on 09/28/2016 7:00:35 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol

Misdirection?

He’s got plenty of other relevant stuff with Hillary’s past...

http://downtrend.com/admin/9-hillary-clinton-scandals-you-may-have-forgotten


62 posted on 09/28/2016 7:01:45 AM PDT by polymuser (Enough is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevcol
The winning strategy....

Hillary - some lame reference to Trump being misogynistic

Trump - "It is really digraceful for someone like you, with your background to criticize someone else's treatment of women. You have a long and terrible record of personally attacking and intimidating the victims of sexual assault in order to protect the predator who committed the assault. I think you should apologize for what you did."

Hillary - "That is real low bringing family into this. Let's keep this debate between you and me."

Trump - "I wasn't referring to Bill's sexual assault of Kathleen Willie or Paula Jones or Juanita Broderick. I was referring to the 13 year old rape victim who you attacked and said was asking for it when you defended her attacker. If anyone at home wants to see video of Hillary laughing about freeing this little girl's attacker my official twitter will be tweeting out a link to the video in a minute or two."

63 posted on 09/28/2016 7:19:21 AM PDT by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

I’m surprised Trump hasn’t touched the Hillary defended a child rapist and bullied his victim issue. That is kryptonite right there against Hillary’s “fighting for children” nonsense.


Spot on! He should also remind the audience that as a young lawyer, hillary was fired by the Watergate Commission for lying and incompetence..40+ years ago!


64 posted on 09/28/2016 7:30:59 AM PDT by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Aetius

Has anyone here considered that this may be misdirection by the Trump campaign?


65 posted on 09/28/2016 8:21:41 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: randita
He needs to attack her for using the government to make herself and her friends multi millionaires. Hit her on her $250,000 five minute speeches to the big banks. They weren't paying to hear her talk, they paid for special treatment.
66 posted on 09/28/2016 8:43:35 AM PDT by peeps36 (Obama = the skidmark on America's underwear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl

I have no issue if He wants to respond when accused of being mean to women, of bringing up HILLARY’S treatment of Monica and Flowers and what not... that’s fine, and fair game.

However to just go off on fact her husband was a letch, and she stood by it... that’s not a great win.. But If he goes after her for her actions to try to destroy the women he slept with.. then that’s game and I have no issue with that.


67 posted on 09/28/2016 9:53:43 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Right Brother

That’s a good point. It may well be. With Trump, who knows really?


68 posted on 09/28/2016 11:21:04 AM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

He said he would be rougher on Clinton. Nowhere in the article did he say he would go after Bill’s affairs. I hate the media so much!


69 posted on 09/28/2016 12:31:16 PM PDT by cowboyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Thanks - I was flamed on hot coals the other day for suggesting that seating Gennifer FLowers in the front row at the debate would be a very large mistake. I agree with you. Let’s hope Kellyanne and Ivanka take care of it.


70 posted on 09/28/2016 12:35:23 PM PDT by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson