Posted on 09/27/2016 4:44:49 PM PDT by Kaslin
I agree 100 percent
She should be offended at his metaphorically holding the door open for the “little woman” who can’t make it without a big strong male’s help. That is if this is viewed from a liberated point of view. Embarrassing to real women.
Mr. Dolt either is just plain stupid or his boss received orders he couldn’t refuse. In any case, Dolt conducted a farce, not a debate. In a traditional debate, both sides discuss the same question. If not, you’ve got talking about oranges and the other apples.
“”voters will know if their potential president owes money to, who he owes it to and any business conflicts.””
He doesn’t know a heck of a lot about tax returns, does he? Would have been better off keeping his mouth shut on that one.
It’s pretty ironic that the Clinton campaign found the architect that Trump had hired at one time who apparently had a beef with him and the way his bill was paid. When have the Clintons ever done ANYTHING that required hiring someone to do a job and finding they weren’t satisfied with the job performed? NEVER??? Anyone in any business and especially the huge business enterprise that Trump runs is bound to have conflicts regarding materials, workmanship, bills etc. Hillary acted like this was out of the norm...and I guess for her, it would be! When you’re in politics, you don’t have to produce anything. Same with being an attorney!
Here’s something else Americans need to figure out:
Elections are the media’s big payday. They mean big advertising bucks that must in most cases be paid up front.
Therefore, it is in the media’s best interest to use its polling arms to convince voters on both sides that the race is close. It’s down to the wire!
That way, both sides keep their ad buys going.
The media has a HUGE conflict of interest that no one talks about. There is NO WAY they should be conducting polls and hosting debates. Even reporting on an election in which they have a MASSIVE financial interest is a blatant conflict.
This is an issue that must be addressed. It’s the elephant in the room. Or the donkey, more to the point.
So is Colin Powell.
We all know how he is in the tank for Trump. /sarc
Next time, if appears that the moderator is acting as hitlery’s wingman, Trump should stop and say time out. Because the moderator is overtly biased, I reserve the right to pass on your questions and bring up any topic I want.
Trump should announce his intention beforehand to cry foul when needed and turn the debate into an infomercial.
A liberal who funded the Al Gore recount in 2000 boasted of being a “registered” Republican, yet he said that in all of his years he had never found a candidate who so matched his views as Al Gore Jr.
Some turds vote in the primaries one way but for the opposite party in the general election.
Why did he have an earpiece, I thought they were banned for moderators???
Kaslin, you, and all of the rest here are looking at this in the wrong way.
Lester Holt is ALIVE this morning, and in no danger of a “Tragic Accident” or “random” shooting!
In addition, his continued employment is secured.
That is what really matters, isn’t it?
If he’d gone after Hillary the same way he went after Trump, he’d be looking over his shoulder this morning, on the watch for some crazed liberal, or in danger of a tragic “Weight-lifting accident”.
He can at least sleep peacefully tonight, over the clank of his Democrat Slave Chains.
I’m a registered Democrat, precinct captain and election judge. Seriously, I am. The later two are elective offices. I got elected to both offices with a handful of write-in votes and zero campaigning. Seriously, I did.
I want to believe you however, your actions belie your statement, what to do?
MARTHA RADDAZ GRILLS PENCE Here's a good indication of the kind of 'moderation' you can expect from Martha Raddatz. She has all the charm of a hyena
Here's the first problem, we have assented to our enemy's description of events. Calling what Lester Crowley did, "fact checking" validates the point as a fact when it is not. When these so-called journalists inject their invalid opinion into an opinion commentary, they have no claim to impartiality or to truth. We cannot validate what Lester Crowley did by calling it "fact" checking, when it was simply him behaving like a crooked butcher with his thumb on the scale.
If Hillary Clinton requires a tag-team partner for a Presidential debate, how will she ever lead the country against some of the greatest threats we’ve ever been faced with?
ca-ching!
I see what you did hear...
Looks like a BUNCH of us have figgered this out!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.