Posted on 09/27/2016 11:57:55 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
Does THIS change the story a little?
Keith Scott was carrying a stolen gun when he was shot and killed during a confrontation with police in Charlotte, North Carolina, authorities have said.
The gun was reported stolen after a breaking and entering, according to the police.
A breaking and entering suspect told agents at the bureau of alcohol, tobacco, firearms and explosives that he had sold the gun to Scott, ABC 11 reported Monday. He is now in custody.
Scott’s wife Rakeyia, who filmed her husband’s killing on Tuesday, had filed for a restraining order against him and had told authorities he carried a gun, hit her as well as one of her children and had threatened to kill her, records have shown.
That gun his wife says he doesn’t own? It showed up in the paperwork when she filed a restraining order against her husband. Who had a LOADED gun on him when he was shot.
The guy who’s being held up as Charlotte’s BLM martyr? Not such a sweet guy.
…’He hit my 8 year old in the head a total of three times with is [sic] fist,’ she wrote on the form published by TWC News.
‘He kicked me and threaten [sic] to kill us last night with his gun. He said he is a “killer” and we should know that.’ (from the Daily Mail)
This fits with ClashDaily’s report about his ‘Traumatic Brain Injury’ which includes information on his previous interactions with Police officers.
There’s also the small matter of what *EXACTLY* he served 7 years in prison for.
According to court records, Mr. Scott was born in South Carolina, was about six feet tall and weighed 230 to 250 pounds. While living in South Carolina in the 1990s, he was charged with a number of offenses including check fraud, aggravated assault and carrying a concealed weapon. Later, he moved to Texas where he shot and wounded a man in San Antonio in 2002, for which he was convicted and sentenced, in 2005, to seven years in prison. He was released in 2011. New York Times
It’s hard to paint someone as a ‘victim’ with someone know for attacking others. But that hasn’t stopped anyone from trying.
No. Facts are irrelevant.
How do you unburn or unriot? Do these rioters say “Whoops, our bad? We good now? Simply put, to them it just doesn’t matter. Cop shot a black, the cops are to blame.
Don’t matter. There’s stores to loot.
If you think facts and reason are going to dissuade these hooligans from committing crimes, come talk to me about some swamp land that’s littered with gold nuggets.
this story for sure was posted by someone with lighter pigment, and the darker pigment has a right to call this post racist. No matter what the tone of the pigment is, the darker, the more right one has to be wronged.. and being wronged by someone who is right is racist.
While it should, sadly it won’t change a thing.
"Where da loot at?"
btt
The cops knew none of this when they approached him.
He was a secondary target.
You get out the car, put the gun down and your hands up and worry about the rest later.
Because he could not do those things, he doesn’t worry about anything anymore.
Exactly. Never let the facts get in the way of a riot.
You don’t say???
I would like to see what actual early news reports were filed as compared to what the facts end up being.... I have a feeling that the media is ginning up much of this violence.
Once again the facts have caught up too late. BLM and their Media cheerleaders have changed the subject, so the little fraud that they perpetrated has already served it’s purpose. The original truth no longer matters. Great world we’re living in, huh?
t’s hard to paint someone as a ‘victim’ with someone know (sic) for attacking others. But that hasn’t stopped anyone from trying.
Free TV’s is in their DNA.
For later reference.
The media and rioters don’t give a fat crap if any of it is true or not. The rioters just want an excuse to throw bottles and set things on fire. The media is always trying to fuel a race war, they live for it.
...plus we get “free stuff”
When the media covers police shootings closely, as they have been; they are in essence participating in the event.
As such, they are partners with BLM and other anarchist groups.
Responsible media would wait until at least some of the details are in. Just because it’s on You Tube does not mean it should not be vetted.
However, media news is a business, not a duty. So ratings rule.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.