So firing a weapon is evidence of intent to harm for the FBI?
If so, they why isn’t a private email server evidence of intent to circumvent law? That’s far more obvious a crime, since law forbids government classified email from being outside a secure system.
On the other hand, the law permits firing rifles.
And .223 is not an assault rifle. It’s a repeating rifle that takes down varmints and predators like coyotes.
“So firing a weapon is evidence of intent to harm for the FBI?”
Worse, “So ‘someone else’ firing a weapon is evidence of intent to harm for the FBI?”