CNN Panel: Clinton Knows Her Opponent Better than They Know Themselves

NewsBusters.org ^ | September 25, 2016 | Nicholas Fondacaro

[Chengdu54]

Wow! I wish Trump would use that line!

[Heart of Georgia]

“But you will not find that I ever changed a view or a vote because of any donation that I ever received.”

Well, she can’t make that claim again.

[catnipman]

“She will show up “awake, alert and sharp as a tack” only to collapse for 48 hours afterward.”

Yep. they’ll have her doped on some drug(s) to make her eyes sparkle, well for 90 minutes anyway.

[Heart of Georgia]

"Host John King played a clip of Clinton leaving Senator Bernie Sanders speechless after slamming his questions about her speaking fees as a smear, saying it was a clue about how Monday’s debate might turn out."

Hellary: "If you've got something to say, say it directly. But you will not find that I ever changed a view or a vote because of any donation that I ever received. So I think it's time to end the very artful smear that you and your campaign…"

If the smear fits...

[RightGeek]

[digger48]

Technically, she could be correct.

Her views or votes never really changed, only the price.

[freddy005]

The night Sanders lost the nomination....what an idiot he was
(Is)!

[Cementjungle]

The difference is that Trump had the right to sell what he sold

And, he actually delivered too.

[rod1]

Any guesses who will be remotely answering the debate questions for Hillary via the mike and ear bud?
If she is physically able to stand for 90 minutes (drugged up), she will need a puppet master to do everything else. She risks being “confused” (as per Huma Abedin.)

[Heart of Georgia]

So true. Every word she says is carefully parsed.

However, I took her “you will not find” as her smug lawyer speak for “the evidence has been obliterated.”

[Daffynition]

As Don King said the other day: *Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*

I hope this distinction shines through tonight. God help America.

[EDINVA]

“Trump ain’t Bernie Sanders.”

Practically ROFL at the image of Trump stepping aside for BLM protesters who want to grab his mic. Sure. Oh, absolutely!

[Kaslin]

BTTT and ^5

[Heart of Georgia]

“The difference is that Trump had the right to sell what he sold...”

I would love for Trump to say that. Then I’d like to see her hack up a fur-ball while trying to respond. That would do her in.

[xp38]

She does get to go first since the first question will be hers. :)

[Luircin]

PFFFFHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Oh, wait. You were serious?

Let me laugh a little bit louder!

[coloradomomba]

Reminds me of a student my friend,a teacher in Chicago, had in her school..Female..pronounced Fe mal ay...

[vpintheak]

Wow. Parents are such idiots sometimes.

[exDemMom]

If she gives Trump any lip about it he could just ask her why she had her phones smashed with a hammer when they were under subpoena, why she had her e-mails deleted with Bit Bleach when they too were under subpoena.

For that matter, what happened to the Rose law firm records?

[exDemMom]

Hellary: "If you've got something to say, say it directly. But you will not find that I ever changed a view or a vote because of any donation that I ever received. So I think it's time to end the very artful smear that you and your campaign…"

So the temporal association is backwards--she promised a vote or an action *if* the person wanting the "favor" would make a donation. It is unethical influence peddling regardless of the temporal relation of the events.