VAYRRRRR-EEEEEE CUTE!
awwwhhhhh.... cute!
Posted on 09/25/2016 11:54:31 AM PDT by Nacho Bidnith
Bushes only loyalty is to themselves.
Bushes (both) never defended their politics when they were leaders of the party!
good riddence
Tell me about it, I voted for him twice as well. But, with the rigged system, we’ve now learned it really didn’t matter who we voted for, they selected our choices for us. So much for Liberty.
I didn’t know that about how Bush reduced interior and border enforcement after 9-11. So many Trojan Horses.
>>I appreciated his speech at ground zero,the country really needed that.
************************************************************
It was nice to hear at the time, but looking back at it now, it was, as DJT says, “ALL TALK”. The action he took wasn’t against the Saudis, he took our sons and daughters to war against Iraq and Afghanistan. Go figure.
...because you are right.
What has been seen can not be “unseen”.
The veil has surely been lifted. The people running the government are Satan’s workers.
I am truly sorry and repent for my votes for bushies 1& 2.
Now that the evil has become manifest, it won’t be long before the manifestation of the actual demonic supernatural entities on the earth and in the flesh.
You were thinking, and that’s more than most folks do. You have to project into the future, to avoid pitfalls and achieve decent goals.
All three of those are problematic.
I believe three is less feasible than you thought. It seems to have worked reasonably well for ‘the West’ in Iraq.
It didn’t in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Trying to win these folks over is very problematic do to the influence of Islam.
I’m not under any delusion about Iraq, but at least it is peaceful with it’s neighbors. It isn’t killing it’s citizens, the Kurds, or threatening other nations. We do still have friends there, IMO.
Thank you for the link.
I think your number three had some merit. I just think it’s very problematic considering the terrorism we have here, the hatred for the U.S. taught over generations, and no way to really facilitate the harmony we both want.
“He practices what his faith inspires him to do. I can’t understand why he is vilified by Christians.”
Dubya’s only reasons I can see for his performance at the memorial for the slain Dallas LEOs would be that he was drunk or purposefully disrespectful, and the first is a poor excuse.
And Reverend Cruz bird-dogging married lady aides? Phooie!
Go Trump! No excuses, no apologies, no BS. Win win win.
John Glenn is more like 50+. John Glenn was told by NASA in 1962 that his psychological profile suited him to public life more than the other astronauts, so he resigned NASA and ran for a Senate seat. NASA was nice to him, he was fired "kindly". He was good for going into space alone but was clearly not a team player. He didn't view the space program as something to improve the country and world. To him, it was something to exploit. His service with the DemonRats in Congress shows the same thing.
Good point. The Bushes are New World Order just like the Obamas and the Clintons. I’ve been looking at the stories from the past that I dismissed previously like the Mena Airport Bush/Clinton CIA drug running connection and now believe there is substance to these stories.
There’s a reason the Bushes and Clintons are so cozy. Now cozy with the Obamas. The Bushes never believed in Reagan’s policies. If you look back on the grandfather and the rest of the Bushes, they have been pretending to be a conservative family for a long time. The grandfather even had Nazi ties during the war and was close to being indicted. Prescott Bush was a banker with shady dealings and also a founding member of Planned Parenthood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush
I’m so glad Jeb didn’t have a chance.
You are right.
Personally, I never believed in him; his father had taught me what globalists the Bush clan were.
I very reluctantly voted for him in 2000; I refused to do so in 2004: He vindicated my worst fears when he sent our men abroad to die for globalist wars while doing nothing to control our borders. He had exposed himself by then.
His embrace of the distaff Obama is the embrace of one globalist to another.
He disgusts me.
Your humble opinion is on the money.
It is part of the Kabuki Theater.
Contrary to the talking heads who all on cue eulogize him as too much of a gentleman to fight back, it was his assigned role as the controlled opposition to allow the media to keep the Democrats on top at all times, even when a Republican was in office.
They are the Two-Headed Serpent: globalists all. That is why he embraces Obama but denounces Trump.
Yes.
I grew up hearing how evil the CIA was, and I always doubted.
I doubt no longer.
I do not entirely understand what their endgame is (specifically), but clearly it is not in the interests of We The People who fund them.
They are just another globalist, anti-American parasite feeding off the national carcass-in-the-making.
I am an ordained minister, and I tell you that turning the other cheek does not mean what you have been told it does.
It has been perverted by the media to neuter and silence Christians.
I do not regard Bush as a Christian brother. Assuming what I have read is true, I have never seen nor heard his confession and repentance for his “good ol’ boy” years of carousing with sex, dugs and alcohol. He simply outgrew it, as do most men who are not Bill Clinton (another Christian fraud), and who have political aspirations.
He is just another churchian in my opinion.
Faith in Christ requires far more than merely strong emotions. It requires knowledge and discernment.
As for judging (which you will accuse in me), we are actually commanded to judge. Like the above turning of the cheek, it has been perverted.
We do not judge as in condemn; that is God’s purview. We do judge as in discern. Everyone judges in that sense; it is unavoidable. (You have just judged as wrong those who criticize Bush!)
As someone who has practiced his faith at great cost, and has preached and taught the Bible, I do not - I repeat, do not - regard George Walker Bush as my legitimate Christian brother.
The truth is that these two are both political globalists. He embraced her because they are of a kind, not because of his dedication to Jesus Christ.
Jesus denounced hypocrites, and he would denounce Bush.
I actually have some idea... and it is not favorable. (That is no criticism of you or your post.)
I do not absolutely know, but by his fruits he is known.
He has never to my knowledge ever truly confessed, repented, and repudiated his early years of carousing; assuming both the tale of those years and his lack of said repentance are true, then his witness is a sham.
As a friend of mine said long ago: “Outgrowing a phase is not the same as repentance.”
Add to that his failure to keep his oath to uphold the Constitution, and to serve the American interests over, say, those of Saudi Arabia, and, yes, his spiritual condition is questionable. He is a globalist, and I believe he is of this world, not of the next.
I could be wrong... but I doubt it.
Thank you. That’s a very thought-provoking post.
Well said.
They’re completely unaccountable, have black budgets, licenses to kill, “national security” excuses everything, and they’re interwoven into everything, everything.
Those who are very smart, have skills, and stand out by actions are often visited by a recruiter (watch the opening scene of Air America).
The pay is great but you trade your soul, as you’ve no doubt ascertained.
“W. is a deeply Christian man.”
No he isn’t. He has some kind of 12 step recovery religious bilge sloshing around in his skull; that is all.
Christians do not call the 1,400 year old crime spree called Islam, a “religion of peace”.
Bush is a globalist. A nut from the Bohemian Grove, like his father.
Me, too. Looking forward, I’ve resolved never to do that again. A globalist is a globalist, no matter what costume he wears.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.