Sorry... But this is not scientifically true.
The scientific fact is: Sub Saharan Africans are the only race which does not have Neanderthal DNA.
That is a fact.
I don’t know if that is a good thing or a bad thing, but it does make them different and could by itself explain many things.
Meanwhile for forty bucks you can send a saliva sample in and have your ancestry calculated.
Hardly a “social construct”. You can measure it these days. Unlike the gay gene which doesn’t exist. I bet these Dan me “scientists” would say being gay is inherent.
There are no different dog breeds just dogs and all dogs are the same.
It is stupid assertions like these that fly in the face of reality that are causing so much of today’s social problems.
A better solution is to acknowledge that the races are different and that perhaps a friendly separation is a better answer. It is abundandantly clear that blacks and whites cannot peacefully coexist - ANYWHERE. Why keep denying what is so obvious? (There is a reason for it, it’s the significant difference in the AVERAGE IQ of the races)
Wishing away reality has never been a good formula for success.
Even Lincoln understood this but lacked the will to do it.
http://www.etymonline.com/cw/lincoln.htm
Neanderthals have always been portrayed as slow and dim witted, not surprisingly since they are not around to defend themselves or counter the argument, but they had much larger brain cases than even modern homo sapiens. The fact is that those groups that interbred with them have made many more technological advances and developed more modern cultures and societies.
Perhaps Neanderthals were the victims of genocide by the "refugees" that came later.
The scientific fact is: Sub Saharan Africans are the only race which does not have Neanderthal DNA.
_______________________________________
If this is true, it certainly is interesting information that I have never before heard. If you could direct me to more information on this I would very much appreciate it.