Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NYRepublican72

How much would this change if the numbers were normalized for D+4?


6 posted on 09/24/2016 9:44:53 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CatOwner
How much would this change if the numbers were normalized for D+4? It would roughly be Trump +4. Here's the actual D/R/I amongst registered and likely voters, buried of course in the second-to-last paragraph of the ABC article. "This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cellular telephone Sept. 19-22, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,001 adults, including 651 likely voters. Results have a margin of sampling error of 3.5 points, including the design effect, for the full sample, and 4.5 points for likely voters. Partisan divisions are 33-23-36 percent, Democrats-Republicans-independents, in the full sample, and 37-27-28 among likely voters."
9 posted on 09/24/2016 9:47:59 PM PDT by NYRepublican72 (Radical Islamic terrorist Omar Mateen is "Ready for Hillary!" Are you too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: CatOwner

“if the numbers were normalized for D+4?”

Why is D+4 “normal”?

In the midterms two years ago it was an even split between dems and reps (36-36-28).

In 2012 when Obama won it was D+6.

I wouldn’t be surprised if republicans beat dems in turnout this year.

D+10 in this poll is obviously absurd. Hillary won’t overperform Obama. This gives her a false sense of comfort. Her stupid handlers probably believe the poll is accurate.


22 posted on 09/24/2016 10:08:19 PM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson