Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hulka
Aren’t you—like me and a few others—wondering how an investigation could take place so quickly, witness statements, forensics and blood tests alone would take more than a couple of days.

I would be surprised if they didn't have ALL witness statements within HOURS. You don't need forensics to know that the guy was killed from a shot by the officer. The ONLY question was whether the officer discharged her weapon within department guidelines and within state laws. Guilt or innocence will come from her trial. Cops arrest on mere suspicion and the DA charges on reasonable expectations all the time.

219 posted on 09/22/2016 4:30:50 PM PDT by AmusedBystander (The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: AmusedBystander

We differ. Thank you for your civility. Rare these days.

Taking witness statements takes a long time, and lawyers are involved as well.

All facts need to be collected and presented, too include factors that might impact on the decision to shoot or not.

Sequence of events, recreation step-by-step of the incident (with timing cues), collating everyone’s videos, recreating each officers point of view (what they can and can not see), and then the question about the thug. . .was he high? Was he tased before the shot or just after? Was he actually reaching for something?

The most confused time when trying to get a factual analysis of a situation is immediately or just after the incident occurs.

Facts and information are just too jumbled within days of the event and with conflicting statements.

These have to be assessed to help determine facts, flow and information, review different/alternate sequences of events and other possible factors that were at play.

These all have to be collected, collated, organized, analyzed and evaluated before taking someone to be indicted.

Do we have all the facts? Most likely not.

As we know there are conflicting reports about when (or if) a taser was fired, timing of the entire event, from first call to final actions, and everything that happened in-between, these are important to know so you may be able to decide honestly if an indictment is warranted, and if so, to what level for the charges. The prosecutor must be able to credibly place a Grand Juror in the officers shoes to accurately assess if the action taken passes the reasonable person test.

Just a couple of days is not nearly enough to time to sort the mountain of evidence related to a shoot.


222 posted on 09/22/2016 5:09:50 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson