MORE MEDIA LIES=> NBC-WSJ Poll with Hillary Up 6 Points Is Weighted with 14% more Democrat Voters!

Gateway Pundit ^ | 9/22/2016 | Jim Hoft

[Voluntaryist]

The liberal media and #NeverTrumpers cheered a new NBC/WSJ poll showing Hillary Clinton up by 6 points nationally.

[JustaCowgirl]

Hillary barely knows what day it is, much less have a false sense of comfort. But yes, her camp does know, and they are trying desperately to do something about it. Emphasis on desperately, because it’s hard to know to what lengths the Democrats are willing to go. Anything Barkey thinks he can get away with.

[ScaniaBoy]

Democrats: 32, Republicans: 25, Independents: 38 Dems +7

With leaners:

Democrats: 45, Republicans: 37, Independents: 13 Dems:+8

Still, Dems way oversampled.

[Grampa Dave]

Murduck owns WSJ and his minions have been doing this bs since Trump started winning the primaries. The article below was posted in Feb, 2106, and they are still posting the same lying bs.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3398474/posts

Three Strikes - 3rd Time This Campaign Season NBC/WSJ Caught Promoting Agenda Polls
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | 02/17/2016 | Sundance
Posted on 2/17/2016, 4:57:15 PM by PJBankard

The team of NBC and Wall Street Journal (Rupert Murdoch owned) has struck again with their latest highly coordinated and heavily manufactured latest “Agenda Poll”. We have previously revealed NBC/WSJ’s prior two constructs.......

[SNIP]

Remember, an “agenda poll” is not created to show a statistical snapshot of the presidential race. An “agenda poll” has nothing to do with the support. Agenda Polls are manufactured to create media talking points, to create media narratives.

Agenda polling is about setting out to make a story, to sell a specific narrative, by using polling as the means to justify the story you are selling. Nothing more, and nothing less.

[Voluntaryist]

Yes I totally get it! Thanks for your post :)

[Tanniker Smith]

Kind in mind when adjusting these polls: from 1996-2012, Dem turnout was 4-6% more than Republican turnout every time, except 2004, where it was even.

Also, the Independent vote has been pushing upward.

[Tanniker Smith]

Also curious about these exit polls: in 2000, 2004, 2008, the percent of the electorate who in the exit polls stated that they were gay, lesbian or bisexual was 4-5%, and of those 20-25% voted R.

In 1996, they only have the breakdown of the vote (R/D/I) but not % of the electorate.

IN 2012, they didn't ask the question (or they just didn't report it).

[HamiltonJay]

Clinton is down at least 3-5 at this point of the game... these gas lit polls are laughable.

[FenwickBabbitt]

Say it ain’t so. And here I thought the NBC/WSJ polls were good ones. They were so accurate after all when they were the only polling outfit that said we’d have GOP nominee Ted Cruz running against Hillary now. /s

NBC/WSJ polls have been insanely off-kilter outliers for over a year now. I would have thought their nonsense polls from the primaries would have already been enough to blow their credibility. Obviously, credibility is not something they are trying for.