I guess that was my main question about it is whether it is Constitutional or violates “unreasonable search and seizures.”
Depends on the judge at this point, and maybe the way a particular policy is written or applied. But properly written and properly applied, it’s constitutional under existing Supreme Court precedent.
With the Freddie Grey thing, I looked up the term “Terry Stop” which was being thrown around at the time.
“reasonable suspicion” and all that.
Yes, quite Constitutional, having survived several challenges by the SCOTUS.