Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(T)HE NEXT GENERATION OF CHINA'S CARRIER BORNE FIGHTER, THE FLYING SHARK, TAKES TO THE SKIES
Popular Mechanics ^ | September 20, 2016 | Jeffrey Lin and P.W. Singer

Posted on 09/20/2016 5:18:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

New imagery shows that the China's carrier borne fighter, the J-15, will receive major upgrades, which point to gains in not just China's engine making but overall carrier fleet.

Chinese Military Aviation

The Original Article

The initial J-15s, derived from the Soviet Su-33, had lighter landing gears (see the nosewheel) and Russian made AL-31 turbofan engines.

The J-15 is derived from the Russian Su-33 (itself developed from the Su-27 fighter), is currently in limited production by Shenyang Aircraft Corporation. It is used by the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) on its sole aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.

Chinese Internet

J-15A

The J-15A prototype, compared to the older J-15, has a list of improvements that include domestic WS-10 engines (seen with silver colored afterburning nozzles), and a reinforced nosewheel to handle the acceleration from being attached to an aircraft catapult.

In September 2016, images of an upgraded J-15, the "J-15A", emerged on the Internet, showing significant upgrades to its engines and flight performance. The plane makes use of domestically produced WS-10H turbofan engines, distinguished by squarish, silver afterburner nozzle,. While some J-15 prototypes were fitted with WS-10 turbofan engines, all production J-15s presently operating off the Liaoning aircraft carrier use the Russian AL-31 turbofan (which has a dark colored afterburner nozzle). If future J-15As use the WS-10H as a powerplant, it would indicate a triumph for China's emerging aviation engine industry, which has long been a weakness. Another likely upgrade is the installation of an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar, which has improved resolution, multi-target ability and resistance to jamming.

Andreas Rupprecht

From Below

Here, we can get a closer look at the J-15A's strengthened landing gear, especially the extender on the nosewheel, which is several times thicker compared to the piece on the older, ski ramp launched J-15s.

However, perhaps the most significant evident upgrade is the reinforced landing gear on theJ-15A's nosewheel, with the extender in particular much larger. Strengthening the nosewheel is necessary for the plane to operate on carriers with catapults; the catapult's aircraft launch bar pulls the J-15 by its nosewheel when the carrier catapult accelerates the fighter during takeoff. Also, the holdback bar needs to be attached to the rear of the nosewheel prior to catapult launch, in order to prevent premature movement.

China IISS

The Future of Chinese Flattops

This fan art of the current and next five Chinese aircraft carriers is actually based off of models from an official PLAN exhibition in 2014. It shows the Liaoning, the under construction CV-17, and the next four catapult equipped aircraft carriers (conventionally powered CV-18 and CV-19, and nuclear powered CV-20 and CV-21). Needless to say, despite their official inspirations, future Chinese aircraft carriers could differ in many ways from these drawings.

While neither the Liaoning, nor China's first domestically built aircraft carrier, CV-17, have catapults, China's third or fourth aircraft carrier would likely possess them, with the J-15's new upgrade a further indicator of such plans. A catapult launch capability would be significant. It would give the J-15 additional range and payload, but more importantly, it means the ships could also carry fixed wing Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEWC), cargo/tanker and Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) aircraft, which require catapults to launch. Larger AEWC and ASW aircraft, compared to the Liaoning's current helicopter fleet, would not just increase the combat power of the J-15s, but of the entire Chinese carrier group.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; j15; su33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2016 5:18:11 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And the J-15 still just barely fits on the elevator, and they cannot put two on at the same time.

This will slow down any kind of carrier operations by 50%, no matter how good they get.

And without the constant kind of training we do, they will never get any kind of efficiency.


2 posted on 09/20/2016 5:22:46 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Before long they could actually challenge US supremacy in open waters... no, they are not there yet.
3 posted on 09/20/2016 5:23:45 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wake me up when they can get 1000 hours on a domestic engine.


4 posted on 09/20/2016 5:37:54 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Anyone here from GE or Pratt who can comment on these WS-10 turbofans?


5 posted on 09/20/2016 5:38:27 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I know nothing about carriers. Are these propelled atomic or fuel? How long are China’s supply lines? Can China produce enough oil to sustain combat?


6 posted on 09/20/2016 5:40:39 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I have always been in love with that basic airframe but the real limiting factor is the lack of a catapult.

Taking off of this carrier type, this aircraft is limited to a weapons load maybe a tenth of what it could be.


7 posted on 09/20/2016 5:52:43 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

In before Sharknado references


8 posted on 09/20/2016 5:53:58 AM PDT by themidnightskulker (And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

“CV” usually indicates a carrier propelled by burning oil.

“CVN” usually indicates a carrier propelled by burning neutrons.


9 posted on 09/20/2016 5:55:25 AM PDT by NorthMountain (Hillary Clinton: corrupt unreliable negligent traitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: themidnightskulker
Go go go go go go go, run away from the Sharknado...

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho! God Bless Texas!

10 posted on 09/20/2016 5:57:38 AM PDT by wku man (Just One Gun, the latest from 10 Pound Test - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6uFqQenIU4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Shoot, the Russkies can barely operate their carrier. It’s not something you can just spin up.


11 posted on 09/20/2016 6:00:27 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Our outsourcing defense procurements to the ChiComs are paying out big dividends now. But all that counts is that the company executives and political bosses got their platinum parachutes.


12 posted on 09/20/2016 6:44:21 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimtom
Carriers are going to be obsolete - usable only against nations that don't maintain a decent SSN or ASM capability.
They are not going to use them against us - but against Taiwan, the Philippines, etc. They'll use ASBMs against us.
13 posted on 09/20/2016 6:58:13 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fella

If its made like all the rest of the crap that comes from China, nothing to worry about, it won’t last more than one or two flights anyway.


14 posted on 09/20/2016 6:58:36 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

Thank you. My mind goes neutral. My thoughts on their carriers were more a threat if they were nuke and found after they are not. Really the real threat is if thy had the logistics to support the planes.


15 posted on 09/20/2016 7:53:38 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Force Recon Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
I was a jet engine Mechanic (USAF 78-80) and the Pratt & Whitney T100 engines used in the F-15/16s could go for at least 1,000 hours before we pulled them for major overhaul. If we had been at war the hours for overhaul was pushed to 1,500-2,000 hours because the engines were that good (Parts were made of Titanium, Silver & Gold)and they use even better engines today these aircraft not to mention the newer aircraft since then.

These look very similar to the first F-18s they were based off the same Russian aircraft as this new Chinese fighter. They had lots of problems with there landing gear, weapons capacity, range and there ejector seats.

I say there about 10+ years away from debugging this fighter!

16 posted on 09/20/2016 10:53:57 AM PDT by Southron Patriot (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southron Patriot

Okay, thanks.

And thank you for your service to this country.


17 posted on 09/20/2016 11:00:18 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone
I also forgot to mention that one of the 1st. F-15A’s that rolled off the assembly line had 1,000,000 hours on both original engines and this was in 1979!

P&W came and examined them and had the USAF pull the aircraft for study to see why this aircraft & engines had not needed to be overhauled at all since it was rolled off the assembly lines.

18 posted on 09/20/2016 12:46:49 PM PDT by Southron Patriot (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Paid for with the stupidity referred to as “free trade”.


19 posted on 09/20/2016 2:29:38 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If future J-15As use the WS-10H as a powerplant, it would indicate a triumph for China's emerging aviation engine industry, which has long been a weakness.

If the powerplant proves to be reliable. That hasn't been demonstrated yet.

20 posted on 09/20/2016 2:33:15 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson