Posted on 09/20/2016 4:26:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
For those contemplating the appalling possiblity of a President Hillary Clinton, just consider: Elizabeth Warren, had she thrown her hat in the ring, might today be the Dem nominee.
On Chris Hayes’ MSNBC show tonight, the always-at-11-on-the-rage-meter Warren alleged that Donald Trump, by imagining what would happen if Hillary’s bodyguards laid down their arms, was urging violence against Hillary. Specifically, Warren said: “for me that’s not even wink, wink, nod, nod. This is Donald Trump saying, hey, there’s another way to deal here. Again, this kind of goes back to this question about what kind of a human being are we talking about? So he’s losing to Hillary Clinton and his answer is to say somebody should get out there and do violence.”
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Fauxchohantas falsely claims Trump suggesting someone should “do violence” to Hillary.
Ping to Liberal Media Criticism list.
Which one is Hayes and which one is Warren?
Is Liz Warren the one on the left or the one one the far left in that picture?
um, no. He’s suggesting that Hillary is a F***ING HYPOCRITE!
That’s not Trump’s point and Fauxahontas twists it to mean the opposite.
Our opponents can’t tell the truth because then they would have to acknowledge Trump’s point was about the hypocrisy Hillary taking away guns from Americans while she is protected by armed bodyguards.
Trump losing? He’s still up by six points in today’s USC/Dornsife tracking poll and his rallies are well-attended.
Hillary can barely get a few hundred people in a small room.
WITH TOMAHAWK?
The Democrats are running on empty. They certainly are not running on the issues.
If Donald Trump is urging violence against Hillary by calling for Hillary's bodyguards to do away with their guns, then she is urging violence against the citizens of the United States by calling for us to lay down OUR guns.
Consistency is consistency.
Elizabeth Warren, mental diseased and obsessed!
Hmmmm, if Trump is suggesting violence against Hillary for stating that her bodyguards should be disarmed, isn’t Hillary suggesting violence against us rednecks for telling us we can’t be armed?
Hillary is trashing Trump every day.
Classic sign of a dying campaign is when its constantly carping at its opponent.
Draw your own conclusion. Hillary is done.
Insanity runs deep within liberals. Time to break out the frontal lobotomy tools and fix this ailment for warren and her ilk. It’s far to late for any non invasive treatment; she’s just too far gone in her internal insanity.
She no longer even understands English and twists peoples words into meaning something completely different.
I’m not even kidding. There’s no treatment other than invasive brain matter changes available to fix her and those like her. Perhaps a laser can be used to excise that part of her warped brain without leaving a scar.
She’s only angry because she didn’t say it first. She sure doesn’t want to say anything about the British guy that ALREADY tried to assassinate Trump in Las Vegas.
With that face, she should try out for the role of Pruneface in a Dick Tracy movie.
Dems use dog whistles all the time and rarely mean just what they say. It doesn’t occur to them that someone may actually mean what they say and supporters take that at face value rather than searching for some hidden message of oppression or hatred.
The point that Donald Trump was making in his comment was that Hillary does not practice what she preaches in connection with gun control. She wants to take away your gun(s) while, at the same time, uses guns for self protection. Guns held by law-abiding citizens, prevent violence.
What is Elizabeth Warren projecting when she tries to connect dots that do not exist?
Why does the media give the floor to so many people with disordered minds?
Is Warren's hair on fire? Her hysterical and incoherent babbling suggests that she is behaving like her hair is on fire!
Inciting violence?!? Two bombs set off by a jahadist and they want to talk about Trump inciting violence?
Remember the trick—the lefties always say exactly the opposite of what they mean.
So, I read this as Warren wants Hillary out of the way so she can be on the ticket.
The attacks on Trump are just automatic like brushing her teeth and polishing her fake Native American grandma’s tomahawk in the attic. The content lies elsewhere.
Violence is not necessary. A landslide defeat in November is a much more appropriate response to Hillary and Fauxcahontas.
Good grief. Is that actually a male on the left? And a female on the right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.