“Oh wow cant have that....we know all police officers a total and complete liars...the truth is she just felt like shooting someone to prove she is a bad ass...NOT...So I’ve going with cops version to investigation complete....simply because I know everyone else has an agenda and doesnt care what the truth is.”
Really? What if she just screwed up? Ever hear of Eric Scott? IIRC, the audio showed he had roughly 2 seconds to comply with differing instructions before they opened fire.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2591097/posts
In this current case, there were 4 officers and one suspect. Nothing indicated to me that the suspect was threatening the life of the cops.
No agenda, although you obviously have one. Perhaps we’ll learn more. But right now, this looks like a bad shoot - and yes, cops have bad shoots.
Like I said, until we have her side also, I go with the cops...
Not like I ever heard of the Baltimore 6 that were ALL acquitted
Or all the Dallas police shot by one man..
And then there is that lil thing about nobody upset at all about all the non-cop killings in Chicago.
So unless you havent noticed, there has been a lot of burning looting and harms to communities over people rioting over lies told and then given only 1 side by the the medial.
So my agenda is to wait for the whole story. Typically there a few things initially left out.
Here’s the officers’s side...
http://abcnews.go.com/US/tulsa-police-officer-shares-side-story-terence-crutchers/story?id=42243843