Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Timpanagos1
Yes, but the reason Goldwater voted no was not because of racist views, but rather for certain items contained within the act:

As for the Republican nominee's position on the Civil Rights Act, Goldwater had said he would vote for passage if Section II on public accommodations and Section VII on equal employment opportunity were removed. With his view reinforced by a detailed memorandum from Phoenix lawyer and future Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Goldwater felt these sections were unconstitutional, were unenforceable without a federal police force, and would lead to the creation of racial quotas and affirmative action.

30 posted on 09/18/2016 10:05:18 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong

That is all accurate, but those philosophical details did not work in Goldwater’s favor in 1964.


31 posted on 09/18/2016 11:09:51 AM PDT by Timpanagos1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson