Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earpieces banned after Lauer’s disastrous presidential interviews
NY POST ^ | September 17, 2016 | Carlos Greer

Posted on 09/18/2016 7:02:26 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

Lester Holt, Martha Raddatz, Anderson Cooper and Chris Wallace won’t have to worry about their bosses feeding them questions in their ears when they moderate the presidential debates in the coming weeks.

The Commission on Presidential Debates sent out a message to news organizations Thursday banning moderators from wearing earpieces, Page Six has learned.

Holt’s NBC colleague Matt Lauer wore an earpiece when he interviewed presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on his Sept. 7 “Commander-in-Chief Forum,” which left many criticizing the veteran “Today” anchor’s interviewing skills and judgment.

Multiple sources told us that Lauer’s disastrous performance during his interview with Clinton was largely due to NBC News chief Andy Lack pressuring him to push her on her e-mail scandal.

(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: presidentialdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
No earpieces? Does that include Hillary!'s earpiece?
1 posted on 09/18/2016 7:02:26 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I was going to say.

Earpieces for me—but not for thee!


2 posted on 09/18/2016 7:03:35 AM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Of course this will apply to Trump as well.


3 posted on 09/18/2016 7:07:04 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Proud Member Of The "Basket Of Deplorables")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

4 posted on 09/18/2016 7:07:07 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Megan whosit harangues Trump and is called genius

Lauer presses Hillary and it is “disasterous”?


5 posted on 09/18/2016 7:08:39 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

[Earpieces banned after Lauer’s disastrous presidential interviews]

Disastrous to whom? LOL


6 posted on 09/18/2016 7:08:53 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

A small battery operated spark gap transmitter would end the earpiece debacle immediately


7 posted on 09/18/2016 7:09:13 AM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Does that count for the candidates too?


8 posted on 09/18/2016 7:10:38 AM PDT by SteveO87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

They say Hillary just had a recent bit of surgery on her left ear for pain relief, i would bet its for an implanted receiver. Got swept under the news rug.


9 posted on 09/18/2016 7:10:44 AM PDT by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Disastrous for Hillary not Lauer


10 posted on 09/18/2016 7:12:33 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

“A small battery operated spark gap transmitter would end the earpiece debacle immediately”

Would you explain this more fully? Would this jam the signal or what?


11 posted on 09/18/2016 7:15:23 AM PDT by FR_addict (Ryan needs to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

12 posted on 09/18/2016 7:24:08 AM PDT by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
A small battery operated spark gap transmitter would end the earpiece debacle immediately

That would violate FCC rules and regulations. Only CommiecRATs can do that. They wouldn't jam themselves.

13 posted on 09/18/2016 7:24:16 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Jus Soli + Jus Sanguinis = NBC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

EXCEPT FOR HILLARY, she needs to make it thru her rallies and non existent news conferences


14 posted on 09/18/2016 7:25:55 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

"What?? Uh-huh. Roger that....Er, um...can you please repeat the question, Mr. Wallace?"

15 posted on 09/18/2016 7:26:49 AM PDT by HangUpNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
A spark-gap transmitter is a device that generates radio frequency electromagnetic waves using a spark gap. Spark gap transmitters were the first devices to demonstrate practical radio transmission, and were the standard technology for the first three decades of radio (1887–1916).

The spark gap generates electromagnetic waves over a very wide frequency range....so jamming any adjacent receiver.

16 posted on 09/18/2016 7:29:22 AM PDT by spokeshave (In the Thatch Weave,..Trump's Wing Man is Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
Have either of you actually seen a spark gap generator? I have.

I knew an old Ham Op who started his amateur radio with spark. He was 100 when I left NM in 1986.

The generator looked like a very heavy electric motor. It was a rotary gap type spark generator. They were more powerful than the prior types. The only harmonic suppression was generally in the antenna. So it caused lots of interference. The signal they generated was not a very pure tone, but it worked for CW for long time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spark-gap_transmitter

17 posted on 09/18/2016 7:29:26 AM PDT by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Its so they don’t screw up and use same frequency as Hillary.


18 posted on 09/18/2016 7:31:41 AM PDT by petitfour (Americans need to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Yes. I did read that transmitters can be temporarily implanted.


19 posted on 09/18/2016 7:31:50 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

One thing that Trump can do is walk over to a camera, lift his hair and show he’s not wearing an earpiece. Then say that some people have implied that he’s ‘getting help’ at these debates.

...and just leave it that.


20 posted on 09/18/2016 7:33:17 AM PDT by BobL (If Hillary wins, there WILL NOT be another contested election, for decades - think AMNESTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson