Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE SOUTHERN BORDER WALL (vanity)
September 15, 2016 | A Navy Vet

Posted on 09/15/2016 4:21:48 PM PDT by A Navy Vet

I keep writing Trump's site that he should drop "the wall" terminology and replace it something a little more benign sounding...open to suggestions.

California (of all places) built a double-fence with razor wire atop, lights, sensors, and a road in-between for BP patrols on less than a third of our border. It reduced Cali's illegal immigration by over 90%. That's why Arizona became such a big deal during the Minutemen days.

From Yuma to Tucson there is nothing but wasteland and the Mexican border is far from the nearest hwy (I-8). It would take army size logistics to get the illegals and/or drugs across that immense desert that I personally drove through on my way to join the Minutemen. Don't believe me? Look at a map.

Eastern Arizona has roads from Nogales, Tombstone, and Bisbee that lead to staging areas at I-8. That's where a Calif type barrier would be a benefit. Texas is more problematic with all their border towns. So, just build longer Calif barriers.

One more time! We don't need a brick and/or concrete wall along the entire border! We only need the Cali fence in strategic places. I am so sick of nobody listening to the above point. GOOGLE: CALIFORNIA FENCE + DUNCAN HUNTER. The facts are there! THE DAMN THING WORKED! Sheesh, Donald, have your immigration policy advisors do their homework.


TOPICS: FReeper Editorial
KEYWORDS: borders; illegal; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: A Navy Vet

WALL!


21 posted on 09/15/2016 6:07:33 PM PDT by stilloftyhenight ("Victorious warriors win first, then go to war." Sun Tsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

In my opinion, those who are turned off by Trump’s talk of a wall, will be equally turned off by talk of any impenetrable barrier to illegal immigration.

People who are already that soft in the head, and not cognizant of the fact that our nation is effectively being colonized, probably won’t be swayed by mere semantic labels.

Even worse, Trump would lose the rock solid support of ten times more Americans who do understand what’s at stake, if he softened one iota on his promise.

He can’t do this now. It will have to be a part of the negotiating process with Congress, the budget, and bare bones reality, AFTER the election.


22 posted on 09/15/2016 6:33:52 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

My statement was not intended as an insult.

However you are wrong in your opinion, to have Trump tone it down. Not mention the wall!

We need to push back, double down and ride the illegal immigration issue across the finish line screaming & hollerin’ all the way! No more PC wussy metro sexual behavior! If words about a border are wall too macho for ya, you can vote for the tired old traitor, Hillary! You know she likes to keep balls in lock boxes.

Respectfully,
Lopeover


23 posted on 09/15/2016 6:46:19 PM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
"". . .The Wall" has a negative connotation for the "undecideds" . . .<

Anyone who using the term "wall" bothers would squeal like a stuck pig over anything with RAZOR wire atop it.

24 posted on 09/15/2016 10:42:37 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet
I keep writing Trump's site that he should drop "the wall" terminology

When you run for President you can use any word you like.

Meanwhile, back on planet earth, Trump has been winning on this precise "terminology" from the day he announced. If he were idiotic enough to change it – which he ISN'T – he would LOSE.

25 posted on 09/15/2016 10:50:14 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

Minefields would suffice.


26 posted on 09/16/2016 9:12:31 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover
"If words about a border are wall too macho for ya, you can vote for the tired old traitor, Hillary! You know she likes to keep balls in lock boxes."

That's being respectful and not insulting? We're done.

27 posted on 09/18/2016 8:11:47 AM PDT by A Navy Vet (I'm not Islamophobic - I'm Islamonauseous. Plus LGBTQxyz nauseous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

We were done when you posted your wishes for Trump to back off on his language. PC is the problem.


28 posted on 09/18/2016 8:46:11 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

“Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me.”

A lesson my mother taught me.


29 posted on 09/18/2016 8:48:44 AM PDT by Lopeover (2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson