Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: detective

‘Start with the fact that she ­humiliated the so-called best and brightest news organizations. Despite her unshakable reputation for being dishonest and untrustworthy, Clinton nonetheless managed to snooker most mainstream outlets into believing that her coughing fits were just allergies.’

I find this a completely silly statement. They werent hoodwinked but are complicit and helpful to her campaign running interference when needed. Theyre also strangely uninterested in any story that doesnt fit her narrative. Yet, they become hyper-interested in any story on the opposition esp when its negative. In short, as the title reads, theyre biased to the extreme. Theyre a complete disgrace and have whored themselves for bread crumbs.


9 posted on 09/14/2016 7:44:22 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 556x45
“They werent hoodwinked but are complicit and helpful to her campaign running interference when needed. Theyre also strangely uninterested in any story that doesnt fit her narrative. Yet, they become hyper-interested in any story on the opposition esp when its negative.”

I agree. The people in the media were mostly complicit. They are simply paid liars.

There are also probably a few who lie because they are afraid of losing their jobs.

18 posted on 09/14/2016 7:50:00 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson