Hey Chris Wallace of FOX News... you've got yourself a good debate question here... one the American people care about... WHY WAS THE ABOVE COMPUTER SPECIALIST (WHO DELETED HILLARY'S EMAILS) GIVEN IMMUNITY? (You can ask OTHER questions for the elites... which is usually ALL that's asked in debates...) Just for the fun of it ... ask a question WE care about...
Is there a double standard? Just WHY WAS THE ABOVE COMPUTER SPECIALIST (WHO DELETED HILLARY'S EMAILS) GIVEN IMMUNITY?
Could people in flyover be excused for crimes if 'they say they're sorry' or if they have 'friends in high places'? Is this - the United States - already a hellhole for ALL EXCEPT elites living the the wealthiest ZIP codes clustered about Washington DC?
Toss us a bone Chris Wallace - ask a few questions the American people care about...
Several problems for the IT guy beyond just disregarding a Congssional order. He was in possession of classified materials without clearance. He made copies of them. He transmitted them to 3rd parties over unsecure lines and maybe even sent in the mail. He put them on insecure servers and laptops and phones for HRC and her staffers to lose.
I’m told if granted immunity a person may no longer refuse to answer questions by exercising 5th Amendment rights. They needed to know what he knew, what he did, why and how he did it etc for several reasons. For sure they would want to know if he had any evidence of willful criminality or forethought from State Dept honchos. But there is also the national security issue. They would want to know where this info went so they can assess and seek to mitigate the damage to national interests. They would have to grant him immunity for him to freely provide all this information. If I’m right it makes this all the more bizarre where on one hand FBI says ‘nothing to see here move along’ while the other hand is behind its back pushing a mop to shore up the damage caused by these leaks