Posted on 09/08/2016 1:49:49 PM PDT by servo1969
"She was hit by all sides by different points of the audience, who were very polite to her. Even the man who suggested he would be in prison for doing what she did - the first question out of the box. But everything was, "I was wrong and so was Donald Trump, and he hasn't taken responsibility."
Caddell stated, "By the way, the new argument that 'I used a classified server for classified documents,' where the hell did that come from? I mean, that was just out of left field." He went on to say, "I was on my heels listening: 'Oh, my gosh, what are you talking about?' She keeps going back to the same lies, and she gets away with it because Lauer doesn't follow up."
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
.
And Pat Caddell is a big Democrat!
.
i would like to see an attempt at an unbiased, centrist network
(difficult I know, but an honest effort at it would make me happy)
conservatives talk a lot about capitalism but we don't see the color of their dineros, do we? and then a good conservative outlet too (to balance some of the leftist communistic outlets)
that's at least 2 national networks I'd like to see.
it would take $$$$
either a rich investor(s) or else an IPO with a capable person(s) in charge to build it and make it work
Yes, there is such a system. It's on a parallel secure network, run by the State Dept (or at least outsourced to a US government agency).
All government agencies and government contractors that deal with classified information have parallel networks and systems. Depending on the level and the policy in place, a person may have two computers on their desk: one for each network.
There's an "air gap" between the systems. You can't move data from one to the other without submitting it for a security review. In some cases, moving data from the secure network to the insecure network is completely prohibited.
Clinton was supposed to be using this system for all classified information. She didn't, and suddenly invented this claim. I believe the FBI interview addresses this -- she didn't actually use it: her staff used it and printed messages on paper. This creates a new headache, because the "paper trail" must be logged until it is securely destroyed.
The face of evil...
So there's your problem--they never receive information during their education that there is ANOTHER take on the news and events---the conservative viewpoint. It is simply never mentioned. I'll bet the students don't even know what a conservative is.
Quote:
“So there’s your problem—they never receive information during their education that there is ANOTHER take on the news and events-—the conservative viewpoint. It is simply never mentioned. I’ll bet the students don’t even know what a conservative is. “
And Fedzilla and its propaganda outlets in the Media, Education, and Entertainment Complex will keep it that way.
My questions is, will Pat Caddell still vote for her? I would imagine the answer is yes. So sad.
I think Pat Caddell will vote for Trump!
Not only does she go back to the same lies, she embellishes.
Caddell has stated that she should be criminally charged for her lying, yet he also states that he will vote for her anyway. Caddell is showing the Dem party loyalty that knows no limits in reality.
I’d guess that State Department personnel assigned her an account, but whether SHE used it is another matter.
Hillary was offered, but turned down, a placement of a standalone pc for her office use for private email (This is the setup that Colin Powell had). Reason: she didn’t know how to “do email” or otherwise operate a pc. Hard to imagine someone that limited, lazy, and entitled using a secure system, that required logging in with serious passwords, pin numbers, etc.
At one point during the FBI “investigation” there was rumbling that Hillary was going to be caught having given her personal, for her only, secure system password to one or more of her minions. (The theory was that aides took classified material from Hillary’s secured account and retyped/sent them to her as emails to her private server account.) Neither the FBI not State Dept’s IG seem to have looked into that at all. Congressional Sherlocks neglected to ask Comey. I’d like to see this question pursued.
If Hillary used secure communications systems, why weren’t any turned over in response to the numerous subpoenas and court orders. She’s lying one way or the other.
Yes!
Best montage ever! Love the truth serum window.
Did he really say that?
Can you give me a webpage where he said it?
If he said it, is he really so different from so many Americans who vote for candidates they can't stand just to keep the other side out of office?
On your number one, yes, they will vote their pocketbooks.
Because most of the people with money have the most to gain with Hillary. Nigel Farage (sp) laid it out pretty well.
Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules MARCH 2, 2015 New York TimesWASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.
Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.