Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: I Did Exactly What I Should Have Done With Classified Information
freebeacon.com ^

Posted on 09/07/2016 6:16:49 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Clinton: I Did Exactly What I Should Have Done With Classified Information

BY: Chandler Gill September 7, 2016 8:37 pm

Hillary Clinton said that she did exactly what she should have done with classified information during Wednesday night’s Commander in Chief Forum on MSNBC after being confronted by a veteran who said she “corrupted our national security.”

“So, I did exactly what I should have done and I take it very seriously,” she said. “Always have, always will.”

To prompt this, Lt. John Lester shared his background with the crowd. He said that he also had to handle very sensitive information during his tenure in the military.

He then asked how the American people can trust Clinton when she “clearly corrupted our national security.”

“Secretary Clinton, thank you very much for coming tonight,” he said. “As a naval flight officer, I held a top-secret, sensitive, compartmentalized clearance and that provided me access to materials and information highly sensitive to our war-fighting capabilities. Had I communicated this information not following prescribed protocols, I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned. Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself, who were and are entrusted with America’s most sensitive information, to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security?”

Clinton told him that there was no header on the email designating it as sensitive information. She stressed that this was not disputed.

“I communicated about classified material on wholly separate system,” she said. “I took it very seriously.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cicforum; demlies; email; emails; fbi; hillarysemails; server; soshillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
Glad that's cleared up..............
1 posted on 09/07/2016 6:16:49 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Sub-Driver

Yeah, she sold it to contributors of the Clinton Foundation, just like she is supposed to do.


3 posted on 09/07/2016 6:19:34 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run

Hillary’s “header” argument doesn’t hold water...


4 posted on 09/07/2016 6:20:03 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary, Bill and Chelsea for federal prison...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-07/clinton-foundation-charity-fraud-epic-proportions-analyst-charges-stunning-takedown#comments

HOORAY Charles Ortel


5 posted on 09/07/2016 6:21:29 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

They spent 2 or 3 minutes on Clinton’s epic national security violations/disasters. And this was a “forum” on the military?

What BS.


6 posted on 09/07/2016 6:22:27 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

See, see you right-wing, knee-jerk, Alex Jones-listening to FReepers! Clinton won’t lie to us! She’s as pure as the driven snow!


7 posted on 09/07/2016 6:22:32 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (TRUMP THAT BEYOTCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

She survives on this because most of the public knows nothing about the subject.

She put heavy emphasis on the fact that classified documents have headers which say “TOP SECRET” or “SECRET” or “CONFIDENTIAL” at the top and she stressed that she never sent or received documents with these headers.

1) People on her team were explicitly instructed to strip off the headers before sending.
2) Headers don’t “make” things classified. The headers are a mere convenience.

Example #1:
TOP SECRET
Go to the store and buy milk <— it’s not classified. The header means nothing.

Example #2:
We’re moving our nuclear weapons out of Incirlik tonight. Convoy will head down highway 101. <— lack of a header does NOT mean that this isn’t sensitive info.

The INFORMATION is either sensitive or it is not. The header is pretty much inconsequential. But Hillary is trying to skate by saying, “I didn’t see no headers, so it’s all cool, bro!”


8 posted on 09/07/2016 6:22:53 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Wait, NOW she knows what was classified?

I thought she bumped her head and couldn’t tell the difference.

Can’t be that she’s talking out of both sides of her mouth, now could it?


9 posted on 09/07/2016 6:23:08 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary’s campaign will now say the email stuff is over so never speak of it again , just watch


10 posted on 09/07/2016 6:23:53 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
More groundbreaking clarity:

"At the end of the day, the case itself was not a cliff-hanger; despite all the chest-beating by people no longer in government, there really wasn't a prosecutable case," Comey wrote. "The hard part was whether to offer unprecedented transparency about our thinking. I explain to our alumni that I struggled with that part, but decided the best way to protect the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the American people's sense of justice was to announce it in the way we did - with extraordinary transparency and without any kind of coordination." "I explain to our alums that I'm okay if folks have a different view of the investigation (although I struggle to see how they actually could, especially when they didn't do the investigation), or about the wisdom of announcing it as we did (although even with hindsight I think that was the best course), but I have no patience for suggestions that we conducted ourselves as anything but what we are - honest, competent, and independent. Those suggesting that we are "political" or part of some "fix" either don't know us, or they are full of baloney (and maybe some of both)," he wrote. He concluded the memo with writing, "I will try not to bother you with this any longer."

11 posted on 09/07/2016 6:24:01 PM PDT by aspasia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sold it for personal gain and then pushed for action to kill Gaddafi at the request of a lobbyist.


12 posted on 09/07/2016 6:24:33 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Whether such officers will have any confidence in her leadership when she becomes C-inC is irrelevant. When she accedes to the sultanate all of those officers and most NCOS with clearance will be gone. Some will quit. Others will wait for the purge.


13 posted on 09/07/2016 6:24:43 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What is just as bad is her supporters don’t care.


14 posted on 09/07/2016 6:27:24 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Only idiot liberals believe that disarming the sheep makes them safe from the wolves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aspasia

He should do stand-up or continue being he straight man in this joke.

Nobody can take anything he says seriously anymore. Nor John Roberts.

When push-comes-to-shove, they stand with the Dems.


15 posted on 09/07/2016 6:27:46 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Helicondelta

Navy Veteran Just DESTROYED HILLARY CLINTON at Forum: “I Would Have Been Prosecuted and Imprisoned”

thegatewaypundit.com ^ | Sep 7th, 2016
Posted on 9/7/2016, 6:08:44 PM by Helicondelta

The first question came from a veteran who asked Hillary Clinton about her reckless handling of classified material.

John Lester: As a Naval flight officer I held the top secret sensitive compartmentalized information clearance. And that provided me access with materials and information highly sensitive to our war fighting capabilities. Had I communicated this information not following the prescribed protocols I would have been prosecuted and imprisoned. Secretary Clinton, how can you expect those such as myself who are and were trusted with America’s most sensitive information to have any confidence in your leadership as president when you clearly corrupted our national security.

Hillary lied and said her documents were not marked as classified confidential.

Last night Julian Assange announced that Wikileaks has thousands of cables Hillary Clinton signed with a “c” that designated it as classified confidential.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3467005/posts


16 posted on 09/07/2016 6:28:19 PM PDT by Grampa Dave ((My passion , freedom is stronger than that of the Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yes, but she kept on insisting that her email was NEVER IN FACT, HACKED.

Oh really?

So Assange if you have something, tell us now.


17 posted on 09/07/2016 6:29:54 PM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I really wonder if there is some threshold as to either the number of story-changes or proven lies that immutably drags HRC into the “proven-liar” zone. My guess is, there isn’t. When we have military folks of high rank endorsing her actions, and I am just talking about the grossly careless handling of classified info she handled.....not the charity ripoffs, not the racebaiting....just the classified info that could very plausibly get their soldiers killed. To hear military types endorse her is a shocking display of true sickness.

Strongly avoided in media coverage is the idea that 200+ messages from Benghazi to HRC pleading for more security over and over and over and claiming “our security is crap” on an open server is very plausibly causative in creating the opportunity for the attack there. If the left can say that criticizing Islam creates terrorists, then launching hundreds of email messages that say “we are defenseless” on an insecure platform has that beat by many miles.


18 posted on 09/07/2016 6:30:10 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (I had a cool idea for a new tagline and I forgot it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Sell it?


19 posted on 09/07/2016 6:30:28 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Header? Ya mean in large 3” letters? On an electrically submitted document? I noticed there were lots of FOUO in the right side of the documents, a (S) is a give away, in the alphabet T follows S it isn’t (TS), they aren’t combine in the alphabet. If I was employed in Hillary’s office, I could have made millions, its obvious that their handling of classified materials was very callus. You don’t let anyone without a clearance read any document, not even your trusted advisors if they are not cleared for access. If you pass it on, forgetaboutit Ft. Leavenworth has a room reserved for you. We have an Animal Farm Government, and the Pigs are in control.


20 posted on 09/07/2016 6:32:05 PM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (Hillary 2016? ...................... What are they thinking? Another Evita, Imelda??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson