Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even if You Believe the Left’s Excuses, Hillary Clinton Still Violated Criminal Law
National Review ^ | September 5, 2016 | David French

Posted on 09/06/2016 5:14:00 PM PDT by Cheerio

Last Friday, Twitter provided a near-perfect window into America’s divided, polarized soul. That afternoon, the FBI released its heavily redacted report and interview notes regarding Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, and the responses could not have been more different.

The Right side of the Twitterverse melted down. Some of the revelations were stunning. Hillary’s team wiped her server after the New York Times disclosed its existence — at the same time that Hillary herself was publicly calling for the release of her e-mails to the public. Incredibly, Hillary told investigators that she didn’t pay attention to the “level” of classification attached to e-mail communications and didn’t know what the (C) classification meant. She conveniently “forgot” numerous key facts. And — finally — though she used 13 e-mail-capable mobile devices during her tenure as secretary of state, her lawyers were unable to locate any of them. Thus, the FBI was unable to conduct a forensic examination and was unable to definitely determine if her e-mail had been hacked.

In short, what the FBI file revealed was the extent of the Clinton deception operation, complete with lurid details — such as aides smashing old Blackberries with a hammer, an IT employee declaring an “oh s***” moment as he rushed to delete files, and Cheryl Mills participating as an attorney in the proceedings even though she was a witness and possible subject in the investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: clinton; comey; obama
...........
It had nothing to do with anyone around Hillary Clinton. An IT guy at PRN [Platte River Networks] realized one day that he’d forgotten about the retention order and went ahead and implemented it. The report makes clear that Cheryl Mills sent an email, which the PRN techie received, telling PRN about the preservation request from the Benghazi committee. The techie said he knew it meant he shouldn’t disturb the Clinton server, but apparently got confused and didn’t realize this meant he shouldn’t touch the old archives or the backups.

So the IT guy just got “confused.” Well, maybe, but Drum left out some rather important context. On March 25, 2015, PRN had a conference call with Clinton’s staff. We don’t know the substance of that call. Between March 25 and March 31, PRN had its now-famous “oh s***” moment and systematically deleted e-mails. On March 31, it had yet another call with Clinton’s staff, but the contents of that call were withheld through assertion of attorney-client privilege.
1 posted on 09/06/2016 5:14:00 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

She absolutely violated the law over 1000 times. SHE is absolutely ABOVE the law and the DOJ and FBI ARE CORRUPT!! They need a good house cleaning by Donald John Trump and then we start locking people UP!!


2 posted on 09/06/2016 5:19:21 PM PDT by WENDLE (Will hillary now "close" on Trump? ( cough))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Queen Hillary has made it abundantly clear that if the riff-raff continue to bother her, she will hock-up a big green loogie and spit it and send it flying end-over-end onto their slovenly, unwashed faces.

The riff-raff have been warned.


3 posted on 09/06/2016 5:24:49 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
The last line of this piece reads...

... It must feel good to be a Clinton.

Not for much longer Hillary... Not for much longer.

4 posted on 09/06/2016 5:41:11 PM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Hillary is a criminal.

Mr. French, get behind Trump if you don’t want a criminal President.

Egg McMuffin is not going to be elected.


5 posted on 09/06/2016 5:42:48 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

“It’s only illegal if you get prosecuted” - Comey


6 posted on 09/06/2016 6:02:04 PM PDT by Organic Panic (Hillary Clinton, the elderly woman's version of "I dindu nuffins.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

She clearly violated the law, but we can’t get anyone to indict her. Welcome to the Banana Republic, where the well-connected can get away with anything.


7 posted on 09/06/2016 6:16:55 PM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunpowder green
This ain't gonna go away. We still have more doc dumps and a bulldog U.S. Atty. up in NY investigating the slush fund foundation. Hillary will be derailed in her run for the POTUS.

I am absolutely confident there are patriotic Americans in government that will fight. May not seem like it now, but the Clintons are in deep ca-ca.

8 posted on 09/06/2016 6:28:01 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Let’s hope!


9 posted on 09/06/2016 7:09:24 PM PDT by Gunpowder green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I would like to see a Trump commercial featuring (former) military personnel:

“I was a Navy E-4 sonar technician. If I had handled classified material the way Hillary did, I would have been sent to Leavenworth, and I’d still be there.”

“I was an E-5 Air Force radar technician. We had to know what paragraph markings “C”, “S”, and “TS” meant before we were allowed to touch a classified manual.”

“I was an Army command sergeant major, and I would not have permitted a soldier as reckless and indifferent as Hillary to even speak on the radio.”

Narrator: If Hillary doesn’t meet basic security standards for our military, why would anyone consider her for Commander-in-Chief?


10 posted on 09/06/2016 7:13:55 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Since when did this Law you speak of ever apply to the Lawgivers??


11 posted on 09/06/2016 7:20:34 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Since we adopted the CONSTITUTION on the United States!! Ask NIXON!!


12 posted on 09/06/2016 7:22:54 PM PDT by WENDLE (Will hillary now "close" on Trump? ( cough))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Didn’t we Overthrow and Outlaw those writings you call the Constitution when we elected the Muslim from Kenya to be Supreme Leader??


13 posted on 09/06/2016 7:26:34 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Nope. Still there ,my friend, staring right down her coughing throat.


14 posted on 09/06/2016 7:34:16 PM PDT by WENDLE (Will hillary now "close" on Trump? ( cough))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

“This ain’t gonna go away.”

You would be naïve to discount the reality of Arkancide. Just ask yourself, how many people do you know who have met a violent end? Hillary and Bill know/knew something North of 80 of such people. Call it a coincidence if you want, but if you discount it, you do so at your peril.


15 posted on 09/06/2016 9:00:21 PM PDT by Rembrandt (Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

“Narrator: If Hillary doesn’t meet basic security standards for our military, why would anyone consider her for Commander-in-Chief?”

That would be a great ad.

I wonder if her voters don’t care as long as she give them free stuff?


16 posted on 09/06/2016 10:01:39 PM PDT by garjog (Obama: bringing joy to the hearts of Terrorists everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: garjog
I wonder if her voters don’t care as long as she give them free stuff?

Hillary's natural voters are predators and parasites. It's useless to try to communicate with them as if tehy were capable of reasoning. They only understand force, which they love to use against others. My interest is in the low-information undecided voters. I want Trump to sweep as many of them as possible.

17 posted on 09/07/2016 6:17:16 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt
You're absolutely right. I've been following Clinton Scandals for close to three decades now, all the way back to when Billy was Atty. General. These are some bad people. Well connected with other bad people.

Currently, Assange is hold up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. Lil hard to get to the guy. Pretty sure the U.S. Atty of the district of NY would be a pretty difficult target even for the Clintons.

We'll see.

18 posted on 09/07/2016 8:14:40 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson