Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
Maybe yes, maybe no - but it is beside the point that Hitler was completely sold on the Calais theory, and on the conceit that the American Army had mobilized to Soviet levels of manpower with which to attack there. If Rommel rather than Hitler had been in overall charge, D-Day would have been an even more desperate gamble than in fact it was, even without advanced deployment of more forces.

Eisenhower et. al. were sweating bullets over the weather forecast, and if they had known that the Germans had an additional division of forces in Normandy they would have probably delayed - and possibly ultimately abandoned - D-Day. And if the Germans had had Hillary-scale leakage of classified information coming to them - rather than quite the reverse - they would’ve had enough additional divisions in Normandy to make an attempted opposed landing there utterly unthinkable. Quite simply, “too hard."

21 posted on 09/05/2016 8:42:47 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

We had another alternative that was successful. It would have split Hitler’s forces in France.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Dragoon


25 posted on 09/05/2016 9:02:39 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson