Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Military On Culture War Front Lines
The American Conservative ^ | 09-01-2016 | Rod Dreher

Posted on 09/03/2016 12:10:11 PM PDT by NRx

This e-mail came from a medical officer in the US military. I publish it with his permission:

By no means am I getting rich but I make surprisingly good money, enjoy what I do, and have pretty great job security. In accordance with my personal convictions, I am in a non-combat role — this may sound like splitting hairs since I am still in the military but I sleep at night knowing that my job helps save lives, not take them. My plan has always been to serve my time and then reap the wonderful retirement the military offers. But now, I am not so sure. Culturally, today’s military is nothing like it was a mere 4 years ago and 180 degrees from where it was a decade ago.

Four years ago, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) was still official policy. Approximately a week ago, I received a memo outlining a policy and a way ahead for reassignment surgery for transgender troops, something that would have been absurd in 2012. I cannot state this enough: this is how far we have come in 4 years. On top of that, I find it profoundly disturbing that what seems to be psychosis is treated via grotesque mutilation of the human body that, clinically, has shown very few positive psychological results. Military medicine has one of the most robust mental health networks in the entire country. Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, and Marines who have mental health issues from depression and anxiety to PTSD and substance abuse are treated and continually evaluated for their fitness to serve. But, transgender troops have now been given the go ahead (and to be fair, there is a lengthy approval process) to remove or disfigure sexual organs, take hormones, and call it good — all at the expense of the taxpayer. What world are we living in?

Regarding who I am and what I stand for, I don’t even agree with DADT. It’s bad policy and I could give a damn if any of my troops are gay. In fact, in the last year I have had 3 homosexuals serve in my direct command and all 3 are excellent at what they do. All 3 received promotion based in large part upon my evaluation of their performance. The military has always been a meritocracy but that’s changing. You see, I am not worried about some of the fantastic men and women who have served in my command. I am, however, worried about the dirtbag (military-speak for a do-nothing) who doesn’t deserve promotion and who, upon receipt of a poor performance report, accuses me, a trad Christian, of anti-gay bias. That day isn’t here yet but the writing is on the wall. It is coming fast and there is no promise of respite under Hillary Clinton who, let’s just be honest, is likely to win in the biggest landslide in 30 years. We must not forget that she has basically stated that she does not think freedom of religion extends past Sunday and churches who are on the “wrong” side of history, as it were, must change their ways. In other words, in her mind it’s not enough to be kind, considerate, and fair whilst agreeing to disagree.

As an aside (but since I brought up presidential politics), I would also like to note that my anecdotal impression is that Republicans, with their nomination of Trump, have lost the military voter. For the first time in my career, the seeming majority of troops are voting for the Democrat. After Hillary, it seems Gary Johnson draws the most support. I have had several non-religious, non-culturally conservative troops say they have always voted for Republicans because they felt like they were the party that really supported the troops. Unfortunately for the Republicans, I think we can mark 2016 as the year they lost an entire generation of military voters. Granted, we are not the biggest voting bloc but we vote and we overwhelmingly supported the Republicans. Of course, I am not voting for Trump so why should I be surprised?

I am simply hoping to convey the cultural shift experienced across the military within a very short time. I guess I will close by saying this: those who have served for 10 years or longer started their careers as pawns in the Bush administration’s interventionist wars and will likely end their careers as pawns in the Obama and/or Clinton administration’s 41Yq7npz9AL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_culture wars. I will say it again: I truly believe the US military is on the front lines of our country’s culture wars. The worst part is that I don’t think anything can be done right now. In an attempt to bring this full circle, I planned on retiring out of the military but now my family is strongly considering pulling our lifestyle way, way back and living according to BenOp principles. By no means do I wish to sound alarmist but if we wish to pursue a life of peace and piety, BenOp may be the only way forward.

I look forward to the book and, in many ways, I hope we are wrong. But like you, I don’t think that’s the case.

I will keep you and your family in my prayers and I ask you do the same. It’s not easy out there, right now.

In the title of his email, the reader said that the US military is no place for Christian traditionalists. I have a question to you Christian readers who are now on active duty, or are veterans: Would you encourage faithful orthodox Christians to serve in the US military?

Why or why not?


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
No. There is a difference between tolerance and compulsion. It is one thing to say we will tolerate homosexuals in the ranks provided they keep their personal affairs to themselves. (And for the record I never cared for the barracks room talk/boasting by my heterosexual shipmates either.) But it is altogether another thing demand not just tolerance of someone's private life, but actual affirmation of it. The last straw for me was the decision to permit, and demand affirmation of transgenderism in the military. The armed forces are not the place for people with personality disorders to sort out their issues. And the demand that people affirm lifestyle choices that are flatly incompatible with Christian morality and faith is unacceptable. If I were still in and only one moe hitch from retirement I'm not sure what I'd do. But I can't in good conscience encourage anyone to enlist under the current conditions.

I suggest that they do their recruiting in the Castro district of San Francisco.

1 posted on 09/03/2016 12:10:11 PM PDT by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NRx
US Army Pregnancy Simulator


2 posted on 09/03/2016 12:18:07 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

3 posted on 09/03/2016 12:19:36 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

4 posted on 09/03/2016 12:22:45 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Stop torturing me! Stop it! I’ll confess! I’LL CONFESS!


5 posted on 09/03/2016 12:23:47 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NRx
As an aside (but since I brought up presidential politics), I would also like to note that my anecdotal impression is that Republicans, with their nomination of Trump, have lost the military voter. For the first time in my career, the seeming majority of troops are voting for the Democrat. After Hillary, it seems Gary Johnson draws the most support. I have had several non-religious, non-culturally conservative troops say they have always voted for Republicans because they felt like they were the party that really supported the troops. Unfortunately for the Republicans, I think we can mark 2016 as the year they lost an entire generation of military voters. Granted, we are not the biggest voting bloc but we vote and we overwhelmingly supported the Republicans. Of course, I am not voting for Trump so why should I be surprised?

Frankly, I don't understand this position. Several of Trump's main policy planks include making veteran's care a top priority, equipping the military with the best equipment possible, while simultaneously keeping the country out of unnecessary wars.

Hillary Clinton aside, what more would a career soldier want from a presidential candidate?

And when compared with how the military would be treated under Hillary, there's no contest between the two.

But having never served, maybe I am missing something...
6 posted on 09/03/2016 12:31:08 PM PDT by chrisser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
http://i1120.photobucket.com/albums/l486/meodenchina/h484FA8FB_zpsf840b7a7.jpg
7 posted on 09/03/2016 12:34:23 PM PDT by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NRx
The worst part is that I don’t think anything can be done right now.

Of course, I am not voting for Trump

Interesting email, but seriously, why would anyone care what this fellow says. He is a defeatist and has no place in any solution. There is always something that can be done. Voting for Trump has to be seen as better than doing nothing - unless you are a fool.
8 posted on 09/03/2016 12:41:16 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser

“Frankly, I don’t understand this position. “

First of all you shouldn’t believe this unnamed military officer’s claim that ‘Trump has lost the military voter’, particularly when it is being reported by Rod Dreher who says he finds it impossible to vote for Trump. -

How the hell would he know whom military voters are going to vote for? Does he run a professional polling service on the side? All he’s doing is pretending that his own opinion is shared by everyone else in order to sow doubt in Trump supporters.


9 posted on 09/03/2016 12:47:53 PM PDT by Pelham (Best.Election.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

All the women in that photo are laughing at him....as will his grandkids. Pussy.


10 posted on 09/03/2016 12:51:31 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NRx

I have had 3 homosexuals serve in my direct command and all 3 are excellent at what they do.


TMI


11 posted on 09/03/2016 12:53:37 PM PDT by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx; tet68; armydawg505; skinkinthegrass; onedoug; 2ndDivisionVet; ConorMacNessa; NKP_Vet; ...

Good article by a currently serving military doctor. I will state that the few active soldiers I’ve interacted with the last few months are preferring Trump to Hillary.


12 posted on 09/03/2016 12:57:16 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
"But having never served, maybe I am missing something..."

Well, I served my 21 years and retired, and still work around some 48,000 troops on Fort Hood. None of his argument makes any sense; all of his points would argue that, as bad as he may believe Trump to be, Clinton and Johnson are far worse on any of the points that he raises.

Assuming that he is actually in the military, he must have spent too many rifle ranges without hearing protection and has suffered some brain damage. It's far more likely that there is no such military person ...

13 posted on 09/03/2016 1:01:18 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: chrisser
"But having never served, maybe I am missing something..."

Well, I served my 21 years and retired, and still work around some 48,000 troops on Fort Hood. None of his argument makes any sense; all of his points would argue that, as bad as he may believe Trump to be, Clinton and Johnson are far worse on any of the points that he raises.

Assuming that he is actually in the military, he must have spent too many rifle ranges without hearing protection and has suffered some brain damage. It's far more likely that there is no such military person ...

14 posted on 09/03/2016 1:02:13 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

*#&^&!! -— double-tap.


15 posted on 09/03/2016 1:02:42 PM PDT by BlueLancer (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NRx

If it really is true that the U.S. military is overwhelmingly behind Hillary it is time to change allegiance to V. Putin.


16 posted on 09/03/2016 1:19:38 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx
What world are we living in?

øbama's

17 posted on 09/03/2016 1:21:06 PM PDT by onedoug ("The Union, next to our liberty, most dear." --John C Calhoun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thanks for the culture war ping.


18 posted on 09/03/2016 1:23:40 PM PDT by zot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NRx

I don’t believe that there are any polls of which support this person’s anecdotal impressions as to likely votes for Shrillary from serving members of the military being a majority.


19 posted on 09/03/2016 1:32:31 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Stopped reading at “...Hillary Clinton who, let’s just be honest, is likely to win in the biggest landslide in 30 years.”

This dude is full of $hit.


20 posted on 09/03/2016 1:46:17 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (You can't spell TRIUMPH without TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson