Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Hydrazine
The author needs to calm down a little bit before he hurts himself.

A lot of people would agree that this is an irresponsible policy change, and the fact that it came in the form of a newsletter is frustrating for many. It sounds like the legal battle is just beginning on this one, but hopefully they get to the bottom of why this change was made so drastically.

It’s worth noting that nothing major is likely to be affected by this policy change, since no major manufacturer has been contacted or notified of any such information. In addition, the ATF has granted waivers to ammunition manufactures in the past. Source

Happened in June, BTW.
37 posted on 08/31/2016 10:50:10 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
"Happened in June, BTW."

Golly-Gosh-Darn-It-All-To-Heck!

You and your cold light of facts and reason.
And I was just preparing for my best Chicken Little act.

39 posted on 08/31/2016 10:57:41 PM PDT by shibumi (Dancin in the Dark with Tramps in the Park, I'm the Fleetfoot VooDoo Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson