Stalin was right: "The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do." - Joseph Stalin
We have to keep pushing for a Special Prosecutor and/or Grand Jury regarding the daily drip drip of the email/server felonies and the lawlessness of the Clinton Foundation money laundering pay-to-play quid pro quo operation.
faithhopecharity nails the whole "intent" issue that the dems keep repeating to get Hillary off the hook: all that effort is now flushed down the toilet by letting the Clintons off (and so transparently, too.... like when he said he could not prove intent....concerning felony statutes that DO NOT REQUIRE INTENT in the first place)
A summary from January of the multiple felonies and misdemeanors here: Hillary Clinton's Email and Server Scandal: Summary Review and Recommendations Most of the laws mentioned do not require intent to break said law.
From the article: "Former New York City Mayor and U.S. Attorney Rudy Giuliani said he doesn't think there is any way Hillary Clinton should be able to avoid facing an indictment for the "secretive and highly classified" government information found on the private email server she used while secretary of state." "[There are] 13 violations of federal law that she arguably committed," Giuliani told Fox News' "Fox & Friends" program. "This is about as clear as it gets. It is a crime to negligently handle top secret material." If you read the fine print, she was in gross violation of at least 13 laws. . and many multiples of times. . What happened to "We are either a Nation of Laws, or We are Not?"
I hate to get too out there, but does this all feel like some kind of quickening by the dems? Are their internals looking lousy? The NYT editorial today? The obvious set up with the "Russian hacker's fault" meme. . Jeh Johnson, "Department of Homeland Security began considering declaring the election a "critical infrastructure," giving it the same control over security it has over Wall Street and and the electric power grid." Yeah right, just what we need.
It’s really not a complex or nuanced scandal. Pretty cut and dried. At least until you get into the larger issue of why she needed a private email system, free from oversight - the office of the U.S. SoS was available for purchase through the Clinton Family Foundation. The sheer magnitude of this crime is too large for some people to process.
"1. 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information"
"2. U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material"
"3. 18 U.S. Code § 2071(b) -- Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally"
"4. 18 U.S. Code § 641 - Public money, property or records"
"5. 18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees"
"6. 18 U.S. Code § 1519 -- Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations"
"7. 18 U.S. Code § 1031 -- Fraud against the United States 18 U.S. Code § 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio or television 18 U.S. Code § 1346 -- Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud" 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to defraud the United States"
"8. 18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit a federal offense With each law broken multiple times, there are indictable offenses galore.
C'mon Comey, do your job! Reopen the Investigation! No Intent Needed!