Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/30/2016 10:35:37 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

I thought this was about the Southeastern Conference.


2 posted on 08/30/2016 10:37:09 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Jesse and Al need more outside income


3 posted on 08/30/2016 10:37:34 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Don't argue with a Liberal. Ask him simple questions and listen to him stutterThe media fix is in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Where in the Constitution does the government have this power? Would someone please go to court to stop this tyranny.


5 posted on 08/30/2016 10:45:22 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
I'm just surprised the queers don't have a piece of this as well.

I guess it's only a matter of time.

7 posted on 08/30/2016 10:57:36 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

I’d love to read a proxy disclosure which said in effect, “we pick the best athlete for the job, regardless of race, gender, or sexual proclivity.”


8 posted on 08/30/2016 11:10:48 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

The “DIVERSITY POLICE” are at it again.

Different kind of brownshirts, but brownshirts nonetheless.

This is SOCIOECONOMIC FASCISM and no such powers were granted by the Constitution.


9 posted on 08/30/2016 11:21:30 AM PDT by AlanGreenSpam (Obama: The First 'American IDOL' President - sponsored by Chicago NeoCom Thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

“Back in 2009, the SEC instituted a requirement that publicly traded companies disclose plans they might have regarding the diversity of their boards of directors.”

It serves these companies right (although I am not for this government intrusion). These companies have long been demanding diversity numbers from their “vendors” (such as law and accounting firms) and making decisions about who they give their work to based in part on the diversity of the vendor. Turnabout is fair play, although what power does the SEC have to penalize a company whose board or top executive level is not diverse enough?


10 posted on 08/30/2016 11:22:53 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1; All
Thank you for referencing that article reaganaut1. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

”… federal regulatory agency ..."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Wake up patriots!

From related threads …

How long will it take for patriots to get a grip on the constitutional reality that the only "federal regulatory agency” permitted by the Constitution is Congress? This is evidenced by the fact that the Founding States made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, evidently a good place to hide these clauses from Congress (sarc), to clarify that ALL federal legislative / regulatory powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in faceless, non-elected bureaucrats like those running the EPA, IRS, FAA, EEOC and SEC as examples.

In other words, Congress has a constitutional “monopoly” on federal legislative powers whether it wants it or not. But by unconstitutionally delegating legislative powers to non-elected bureaucrats, Congress is wrongly protecting such powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 mentioned above.

Patriots don’t seem to understand that corrupt lawmakers are letting non-elected federal bureaucrats get away with stealing legislative powers, including 10th Amendment-protected state powers which the feds have stolen from the states, probably so that these bureaucrats can do Congress’s unpopular, unconstitutional legislative work for it.

By allowing faceless bureaucrats to steal state and federal legislative powers, crook lawmakers are able to keep their voting records clean, likely so that they can fool low-information patriots, patriots who don’t understand the Constituton’s delegation of legislative powers specifically to elected members of Congress, into reelecting them.

Remember in November !

Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to not only support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also stop non-elected bureaucrats from stealing and exercising state and federal legislative powers.

Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-igoring activist justices.

12 posted on 08/30/2016 11:41:07 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

President Trump will fix it!


15 posted on 08/30/2016 2:07:01 PM PDT by Taxman ((H. L. Mencken correctly observed: Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Don’t worry. My dentist told me that dental schools have racial quotas as well.


16 posted on 08/31/2016 7:15:52 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

What we need is boards that are truly independent, and not give the CEO $240 million to leave the company when he does a horrible job.


17 posted on 08/31/2016 7:19:57 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson