Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/30/2016 7:08:11 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Smoke as in “SMOKESCREEN”!. Definetly not a NO!


2 posted on 08/30/2016 7:09:54 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

“Your honor, despite my not having a city construction permit I can assure you that no impropriety occurred. The presence of a workshop is merely smoke, there is no fire.”


3 posted on 08/30/2016 7:43:16 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is a typical conservative response. When the opposition says there is smoke but no fire, the conservative forgets all about hammering away at the primary issue and, instead, gets enmeshed in a detailed, analytical discussion about the nuances and official definitions of smoke and fire. They think they’ve won the debate on technicalities, but, in reality, they’ve completely conceded the PR battle to the emotion-based left.


4 posted on 08/30/2016 7:52:35 AM PDT by Prince Caspian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Maybe Hillary meant she is throwing smoke grenades to obscure what is really going on.


5 posted on 08/30/2016 8:17:01 AM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson