Wall Street doesn't just see a Hillary win, it sees a landslide ( shades of Brexit!)

CNBC ^ | 8/29/2016 | Patti Domm

[SaveFerris]

They just need the fools to keep pouring into them a little bit longer until they can slice off the top of the Ponzi Scheme.

[Gritty]

It's only a landslide if there is massive voter fraud.

Does Wall Street know something we don't?

[riverdawg]

This is a CNBC article mostly quoting Woo of Merrill Lynch, not the Wall Street Journal. But it is true that the editorial page and most of the op ed pieces in the WSJ have been stridently anti-Trump during the past year.

[Robert357]

It has to be a landslide for Trump, or the Democrats will steel the election. This has been proven many times in the past.

Having said that, I see some that say it will be a landslide for Trump and others that say it will be a landslide for Hillary, and still others that say it will be nip and tuck.

I had my heart crushed during two Obama elections with predictions that the Republican would win and Obama would loose. Not sure my heart can stand a Hillary win.

I read the stories that the polling data is flawed and designed to demoralize the Republican base. Well it is working! It is so obvious that the headline always quotes the Trump versus Hillary survey and adds the closer Trump, Hillary and third party candidates deep within the story.

Still, I hope and pray that Trump will win and he certainly can draw larger crowds, were Hillary has to pay actors to attend rallies.

[ozzymandus]

They bought her, and she’ll stay bought.

[Spirochete]

with Republicans controlling the House and Democrats the Senate. That would maintain the deadlock in Washington.

Hillary has FBI files, ergo no gridlock. The GOP will become the GHP: Give Hillary Power.

[DoughtyOne]

You’re right. Thank you for the correction. I do this once in a while, mis-attributing the rant.