Posted on 08/29/2016 1:10:51 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Bet it’s not an exaggeration. Bet there are child pervs who would enjoy it. In fact it’s probably been downloaded by a bunch of them.
Those same pervs would enjoy the child’s section of the Sear’s catalog, but that doesn’t make the Sears catalogue “criminal child pornography”.
Then Huma could teach the son to be a suicide bomber?
This is a no-win situation.
Put the child in a foster home.
Sears still has a catalog?
I remember them but I don’t remember seeing an ad for men’s underwear where the man was laying in bed with an erection. Comparing that to a Sears catalog is ridiculous.
I didn’t compare them, I merely observed that perverts like that would be turned on by the children’s section of the Sears catalog as well, but that does not make the Sears catalogue child pornography. I was highlighting the absurdity of your logic. Not everything a pervert would be turned on by is automatically pornography. That’s a non sequitur.
My logic is Weiner is a sexual pervert who included his young son in his perversion. Hope the authorities do a full investigation.
How do we know for sure that Hillary didn’t father that child?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.