Explain the article: Red meat for the left, something for them to yell about at next week neigborhood/family BBQs.
I’ve said before, Joe McCarthy must be rolling underground laughing at all this ‘red scare’. It is now often reported as gospel that “the Russians” hacked the DNC, the Russians hacked the emails, and now The Russians are the secret power behind the political right and all without a shred of evidence being presented to the public. It’s laughable. Next we’ll start hearing Nancy Pelosi start calling for hearings in the House.
Possibly, this is Hillary trying to deflect from her involvement in dragging more than a dozen American tech firms into work at Skolvoko, the “Russian Silicon Valley” that the FBI claims was a sophisticated industrial espionage operation. There has been little reported on that so maybe more will come. I have no doubt that Russia spies on us all the time as often as it can, but the specific charges from the left ring hollow while the charges against HRC are rooted in evidence.
Example: "it's not true because the Dems claim it's true." Meanwhile, the world's most (recently) notorious hacker is clinking vodka glasses with Vladi. LOLOL
I was just reminded of another example: the notion that Julian Assange “made it clear” that the Russians were not behind the last hacking attempt. Of course, he did nothing of the sort—and your typical E. European who has been bred to recognize agitrop is wondering: how does this BS make it on to a conservative website?