And if I were looking to obscure my intent, I would want her on someone like her on my team. And Wallace was tenacious in his questioning.
But if you're looking to obscure something, then what is it you're really trying to hide?
The Bannon issue is one I haven't paid much attention to, but would like to know from others here what the substance of this issue is. Is Bannon a vulnerability? If you went over the tapes of Limbaugh you could find a ton of commentaries, meant to be inflammatory and provocative in the context of being a media person, that when used in a non-contextual isolated fashion could paint him as a ‘radical’ right wing person. He's not, but if he were involved in a Republican campaign directly this is what they would do. Is this the same for Bannon?
ofc Wallace and his fellow Mediascums are NEVER “tenacious” in pursuing problems of the Democraps.