Posted on 08/27/2016 4:10:44 PM PDT by Rufus Shinra
Recent media coverage on Donald Trump’s immigration policies have attempted to convince his supporters that he is “flip flopping” on his original deportation policies and moving to a “softer” tone.
This has caused a stir among many of Trump’s core supporters, adding to the speculation that he is caving to pressure from his own party to keep the “cheap labor” express moving full speed ahead.
Trump spoke to a crowd of about 2,000 at the ‘Roast and Ride’ event in Des Moines, Iowa today. Joni Earnest, a veteran and senator from Iowa who was once thought to be a possible Trump vice president pick, was also in attendance.
Perhaps the Trump campaign has been receiving some feedback from his core supporters after the slew of media reports regarding his softening of immigration policies, as he sought to reinforce the fact that he stands behind his original promise to America.
Trump made clear his intentions regarding illegal immigration and criminals entering the United States as he told the crowd:
“On day one, I am going to begin swiftly removing criminal illegal immigrants from this country. Including removing the hundreds of thousands of criminal illegal immigrants that have been released into U.S. communities under the incompetent Obama-Clinton Administration”
Trump continues to state that even “before the wall” goes up he is going to take action on illegal immigration. He also references the international “gangs of thugs”, and drug cartels taking advantage of America’s open borders:
“I promise you, the first day in office, the first thing I’m going to do, the first piece of paper that I’m going to sign is we’re going to get rid of these people, day one, before the wall, before anything, and our great law enforcement – they know who they are, they’ve been living with them for years and don’t want to put up with them anymore. So we are going to get rid of them DAY ONE.”
Trump continues by saying that, “the reign of terror will be over”. He makes several references to the criminal element crossing our borders, including possible terrorists and drug cartels, making sure that law enforcement is not being hindered in their efforts.
A powerful message straight to his core supporters, Donald Trump has made clear his intentions on day one of his presidency and vowed to enable law enforcement to do their jobs.
“We are going to get rid of them day one, we start day one!” Trump said to wild applause from the audience.
Although some Trump supporters have been suspicious of the promotion within his campaign of former Cruz employee Kellyanne Conway, the recent refocusing of his messaging seems to be paying off as he has made up significant ground against Clinton in the polls.
Donald Trump has also stayed focused on his messaging, policies and has not engaged in any off cuff remarks that previously caused a media firestorm.
I believe Trump when he makes this promise to America, as he is not being influenced by massive campaign donations from corporations who benefit from illegal immigration, and has taken risks in running for president that the average businessman would consider insane.
Despite the mainstream media spinning headlines to discourage Trump supporters at every turn; their enthusiasm, hope and dedication to his movement have kept voters confident that he can, and will, ‘Make America Great Again’.
See Trump’s full speech in Des Moines, Iowa below:
Even “Operation Wetback” had a bunch of different and essential components. Some are the same as today, but there are many others that have to be part of the plan.
Likewise, at the time, Mexico was indifferent to US deportations to Mexico. Today they are not only opposed, but encourage illegal immigration to the US, because they send enormous amounts of cash by wire transfer back to Mexico, from their “surplus population”.
Here are some other major variables.
Former president of Mexico Vincente Fox created the Plan Puebla Panama, with the blessing of W. Bush, hoping it would lead to an “EU of the Americas”. The American parts of this included continental rail links along the coasts from southern Mexico to Canada, and the Trans-Texas corridor bisecting the United States. (As well as the introduction of a common currency, the “Amero”, to replace the USD, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican New Peso.)
Definitely an open borders scheme.
The biggest part of the PPP in Mexico was to turn the southern part of their country into a gigantic transportation hub for shipping, aircraft, rail, and truck.
And here’s the zinger: to do this they would first have to depopulate southern Mexico. So the Mexican government ordered all the people who lived there to migrate to America. A HUGE surge of illegal aliens.
I mention this because getting rid of all these Mexican citizens has to be part and parcel of Mr. Trump’s plan to suspend, or at least renegotiate, all these trade treaties that underpin mass migration.
This is just one part of the deal.
But a part of Operation Wetback that was essential to its success still is needed today: a propaganda campaign to both convince Mexicans to not come here; and to convince those already here to go home. Self-repatriation is much cheaper than deportation.
There are so many other elements, such as non-Mexican deportees, and the aforementioned criminal deportees. And while we’re at it, the vast number of “green cards” work visas we issue.
https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/general/all-visa-categories.html
Unless the Mexican government gives them a travel visa in the US airport, they cannot even board the plane. This is why the “kick them across the border problem.”
The problem is, We have ALREADY DONE THIS before, Eisenhower didn’t give a rats ass what Mexico said or Did, he JUST DID IT and Threatened Mexico with WAR if they balked.
See Operation Wetback
The difference between then and now is that then, northern Mexico was very underpopulated, and once you were kicked out of the US, you had to go south, or starve.
The situation today is more like the Mexican revolutionary period (1910-1920).
The threat the cartels pose to southern US cities is close to that posed by Pancho Villa when he carried out his attack against Columbus, New Mexico. Villa was fighting the Mexican government, so this really wasn’t their fault. And when the US tried to respond, with the fruitless Pancho Villa Expedition, the Mexican government still had to put its foot down and ask the US to leave.
The US was willing to fight a brigand like Villa, but had no impulse to go to war with Mexico over it.
And thus it would be to carry out a fight with the cartels in Mexico. Except they have much better weaponry, signals and communications intelligence as good or better than the US Army units sent after them, and a LOT of money.
Bottom line: every Mexican criminal we would throw across the border would become a new cartel fighter, whether they wanted to or not. And the cartels would likely start to get foreign military advisors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.