Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elcid1970

They will chip, chip, chip away.

Same process Muslims are using. It is the fatal “Achilles Heel” of western democracy. By the time they get to final line, the opposition is isolated and ineffective.


9 posted on 08/26/2016 11:28:01 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Scott from the Left Coast

There are no salami tactics when it comes to setting up a national gun registry like in UK or Oz. Either it exists or it doesn’t and only parliamentary dictatorship as in those two places makes it possible.

Not even Democrats will vote majority for Feinsteinian national gun registration. She’s failed at that for thirty years.

Without registration there is no confiscation.


17 posted on 08/26/2016 11:45:00 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
They will chip, chip, chip away.

Time for us to chip, chip, chip back.

We should be actively trying to expand gun rights through legislation. Here are a few points we could start with:

1. Suppressors - NFA regulation of suppressors is illogical and a safety issue. Suppressors make firearm use safer and more neighborly, and by no means should these items require federal registration.

2. Barrel length and OAL restrictions - ATF regulation of barrel lengths for rifles and shotguns, not to mention restrictions on shoulder stocks for pistols, are nonsensical and bear no logical relationship to the safe use of the weapon. Such restrictions should be repealed completely.

3. Definitions of "assault-style" weapons - The regulation of so-called "assault-style" weapons is a flagrant emotional play to get regulation for weapons that are functionally no more dangerous than their traditional counterparts. A federal law should be passed to positively define an "assault weapon" as a select-fire weapon only, that "assault-style weapon" has no legal meaning, and that government is prohibited from making any law to restrict firearms ownership based on cosmetic features of the weapon in question.

4. A law should be passed to positively assert that no person will lose the right to bear arms without due process of law, and that due process must include a jury verdict.

5. Based on the Heller and McDonald decisions, "shall-issue" carry will be the federal standard for concealed-carry licenses throughout the US, including the District of Columbia.

There... that's enough to go on with. No doubt we can formulation some more ideas as we go.

18 posted on 08/26/2016 11:54:13 AM PDT by Oberon (John 12:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson