Posted on 08/26/2016 3:43:31 AM PDT by expat_panama
Meanwhile those of us who work for a living find we can feed our families a lot better if we accept reality as it is, we see the good as well as the bad, and get in w/ the good things happening.
Assuming that the trend lasts through Election Day, it’s probably a plus for Hillary Clinton.
yeah, my very first thought upon seeing the headline: “Why! this is just in time for Hillary”!
I don't disagree with your premise of ‘accepting reality’ as it is, but we also need to remember that the powers that be will try to color this reality to make things look rosy before the election. What's stated in the paragraph above aren't great steps forward, IMHO. Health care administrative costs are out of control, and health care costs as a whole thus continue to rise. As such, there will be lots and lots of cost-cutting pressures in the health care sector over the next decade - unless things get dramatically restructured. Paralegals as a growth market for jobs seems a bit far-fetched to me, and even if true suggests that we are becoming more regulated and litigious - not factors that bode well for general economic growth and innovation. Store managers?
Happy Friday!!
Yesterday's stock indexes slipped a tenth of a % in lower volume (continuing the flat trading they've been showing for a couple months now), while gold and silver seem perched on a couple of new support levels (now at $1,327.44 and /418.74). Looks like everyone's ready for Yellen's speech (Yellen Speaks - Finally! Today we finally hear from Janet Yellen at the Jackson Hole Symposium. Read on to learn more...full story) and our wonderful GDP numbers--
8:30 AM GDP - Second Estimate
8:30 AM GDP Deflator - Second Estimate
8:30 AM International Trade in Goods
10:00 AM Michigan Sentiment - Final
--and:
Sell Stocks In September, or Get Dismembered? - Doug Kass, RealMoney
Why Stock Buybacks Have Become a Big Yawn - Mark Hulbert, USA Today
Stock Market Is a 10% Move Away from Trouble - John Coumarianos, MW
Marxism Always Worse Than All Else, Including Indexes - Allister Heath
Euro Is Not What's Holding Down Europe - John Tamny, RealClearMarkets
There's No Recovery for Central Bankers to Create - Jeffrey Snider, RCM
Labor Trying to Eliminate Right to Work by Lawsuit - George Leef, Forbes
When Unemployment Falls, Thousands of Americans Die - Peter Coy, BV
Investors Move Next Door, Unsettling a Black Enclave - John Leland, NYT
It is all well and good to try and put a rosy picture on the economics of all this for whatever reason - some related to the market and economy and trading in it and some related to political aims, I’d expect.
But when I see data such as contained here:
http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/the_work_versus_welfare_trade-off_2013_wp.pdf
It tells me that in many states, while those “great new replacement middle wage jobs” are rosy, the data contained in this report shows that there a number of states where the income equivalent of the collection of “welfare” incomes ranks at the top of this rosy “$30K-$60K” boon.
Just this morning in an earlier thread the topic of a thread was the big increase in work eligible earners in the 25-50 something age range choosing NOT to work - why is that?
imho being willing to see things as they are is not something that goes very well with the word "but".
...the powers that be will try to color this reality...
The fact that some folks like to taint what they see is part of how things are and we can deal with it. Mean while let's be happy that the mid-level job market's picking up and let's hope the pace extends to other markets as well.
Anemic numbers spun to look good.
Some see that as the big concern. My take is we need to ask ourselves whether we really are having to choose between feeding our families and having our political faction win --and would we really opt for a win for politics first.
Does accepting reality require that we believe there is no inflation, and if in fact there was, food, gasoline, etc. would not be included in the number?
So why is the labor participation rate not decreasing?
Must be all those $15.00/hour burger flipper jobs
($15/hr x 40 hr/wk x 52 wk/year =$31,200/year)!
Gosh, I dunno. Do you follow the number where food and gas is included? It’s not that complicated, really.
I have one of those so-called high-paying manufacturing jobs, and I have yet to reach $15/hr.
I am going to opt out of this new norm. Don’t care to pack hemorrhoids, stock shelves or work for a slimey lawyer. The new norm is the “Dollar Store” economy.
No it’s not... nor is the reality of a middle class decimated by exponentially higher healthcare premiums and continuously increasing deductibles. But the economy is doing fine... really.
What the heck are you talking about? Those Dollar Stores exist for people like me who don’t need to buy paper towels 24 at a time.
So, you are complaining that food and energy are not included, by citing rising health-care costs?
Labor participation rates are at 38 year lows. This article is just another attempt to put lipstick on a pig. I no longer trust federal data, especially before an election. We saw in 2012 how the unemployment data were manipulated to help Obama.
When you see those words in the first sentence or two, you know it's B.S.
Shilling for Hillary - 2016
No, I’m citing the “realities” that this economy is not as rosy as what is being reported...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.