[PapaBear3625]

Because this is something the feminists never thought through – men can opt-out and survive. They will not thrive, and I think ultimately it is at great personal loss to themselves and others, but if they don’t like the family and work deal offered, they’ll just opt-out of both. They will not organise, they will not take to Twitter they will just ‘socially withdraw.’

In any society, one of the fundamental issues is "How can we keep men motivated to work hard to support family and offspring, and be willing to defend the society?"

With women initiating 70% of divorces, more and more men are seeing marriage as an unattractive deal. Too many wind up divorced, and having to pay child support for kids that their ex-wives try hard to alienate from their dads.

So, as the author notes, more and more men are "Going Galt". They are foregoing marriage and family, knowing that sex can be gotten without having to be married. They are working just hard enough to support themselves, and maximizing their leisure time. And real soon now, the feminists will find out just what their new world will turn into.

[kearnyirish2]

That seems to be a big issue avoided here: Once men opt out of families, they don’t have to kill themselves as breadwinners. Why should they? If they don’t need to work, good for them; our ‘hoodrats have been laughing at us for decades now doing the same thing (though they should be breadwinners - they are breeding).

[kearnyirish2]

My feminist co-workers see the new world (any co-workers under thirty are foreigners), and they hate it.

[annalex]

Nail on the head, thanks.