Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KUHNER COLUMN: The dirty little secret about Trump can be summed up in one word: ‘Landslide’
WRKO and World Tribune ^ | 8/25/2016 | J Kuhner

Posted on 08/25/2016 9:14:31 AM PDT by combat_boots

Forget the establishment media, the rigged polls and the anti-Trump talking heads. The dirty secret of this election is that Donald Trump can win — and in a landslide.

The reason is simple: America does not want a third Obama term. The only poll that truly matters is the one showing nearly 75 percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track.

Leave aside Hillary Clinton’s fatal weaknesses and rampant criminal behavior — covertly arming and supporting ISIL, the disastrous war in Libya, Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation, pay-for-play (which got former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich 14 years in prison), mishandling classified information (a crime), committing perjury in congressional testimony to the Benghazi committee, repeatedly lying to the American public and deliberately hiding her failing health. She faces an insurmountable obstacle: Hillary is President Obama’s heir. A vote for her is a vote for the continuation of Obama’s failed progressive policies. This is why she must — and should — lose.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldtribune.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: trump; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: DoughtyOne

Hoo Yah!

TRUMP ROCKS THE WEST!

Kudos to testosterone, and Nigel Farrage!

TRUMP 2016


21 posted on 08/25/2016 10:28:24 AM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christ Rey! Public Education is the farm team for more Marxmsists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska; ArtDodger

> “I’ve been a poll watcher since 2000 and there is voter fraud, but these machines are not on line and everyone would have to be programmed individually, not impossible but highly unlikely.”

Points to retain here:

1. Battleground States decide the Electoral College totals, i.e. a significant number of states are not important so it’s only necessary to drill down into the critical states.

2. Within a critical state, counties are not equal. Certain counties decide the election for the entire state. More populous counties are known to wait until other counties have reported before reporting their own totals giving time for fraud to come up with votes to put a chosen candidate over the top. (This has been witnessed in King County, Washington)

3. Electronic voting machines have been PROVEN by multiple independent groups to be EASILY HACKED by infections by code transferred from MEMORY CARDS required to be inserted in the machines including evading startup boot checks.

4. The memory cards of the previous point are provided to the machines by whom? An Elections Supervisor? Does he or she know that the memory cards are infected? How would they know? How many cards are provided to which polling stations on election day?

Given the points above, a plan can be developed to steal an election by focusing on certain key districts within certain Battleground States and ensuring electronic machines placed in key precincts are equipped with infected memory cards that are dispatched by persons that are clueless and who believe they are simply following procedures.

Next, observe how fast Jeh Johnson jumped on the emerged ‘hacked-fraud-rigged’ issue of today by declaring electronic voting machines to be a part of critical federal infrastructure and to take over jurisdiction of such machines. This was in response to Donald Trump drawing attention to the rigged nature of elections. This was clearly an overreach by Johnson of federal authority to take over supervision of election machines that are rightfully in the hands of state officials.

In sum, a number of machines, not a large number, equipped with memory cards and placed in critical districts of critical states can steal an election today. This was not such a concern in previous years because it was smaller, but now the prevalence of such machines has grown and is a legitimate cause of concern.

Lastly, it has been reported in social media (but not yet verified) Reddit and Facebook that Seth Rich was murdered because he had uncovered that Sanders had won in VA outside DC but was defrauded by fake polling stations where democrats for Hillary voted, where the votes were carried by a few Hillary operatives to official polling stations listed on the SOS webpage and where the fraud votes were swapped out in place of votes made at legitimate polling places. The people who voted at the fake polling stations were presumably clueless.

The story has credibility because it was reported by several people that Hillary’s primary campaign webpage gave directions to voters to vote at polling locations that were not on the official SOS webpage and were thus not approved polling stations. Such voters could easily have been duped, reported to a location and voted without knowing the polling stations were fake. Poll volunteers could have easily thought they were performing a legitimate role for the primary campaign. In this manner, Sanders voters would be cut out and replaced by Hillary voters, there would be no danger of a district showing too many votes, more than were registered. Hillary operatives would have legitimate vote ballots taken from an unofficial location and the crime would be to easily replace a bag of votes taken at a legitimate polling station with one taken from a fraudulent station. The sign-in sheets could also be swapped. There could be a problem in initials of official poll workers on bag labels or sign-in sheets but in terms of fraud, it would be very very difficult to prove or catch in the act.

Vote fraud exists and occurs. It has grown only because there has not been legislation at either federal or state level to make it harder to catch, or any such legislation has been held up in courts as many courts are also throwing roadblocks in the way of persons trying to guard against vote fraud.

The Diebold machines (and similar going by other names) were used in Venezuela to elect Hugo Chavez. Therefore, there is a history of effective fraud. It is not impossible. When there are billions and billions at stake in an election, it is not paranoid to think that persons such as Soros or even Bloomberg, or cronies of Harry Reid, would go all out to steal an election.


22 posted on 08/25/2016 10:46:30 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Hillary can’t be Obama’s 3rd term. She doesn’t even know how to golf.


23 posted on 08/25/2016 10:47:31 AM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; Jane Long; BlackFemaleArmyCaptain; Black Agnes; djstex; RoosterRedux; DoughtyOne; ...

Just a boost to take away the negativity of the media and talk show hosts, and the swelling in your chest, well that’s because you are so proud to be supporting Trump:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oj4K9fr_WgY


24 posted on 08/25/2016 11:13:30 AM PDT by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence; Trump/Pence 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Where are the machines stored? Who made them? Who services them? Are the technicians vetted and properly supervised?

IIRC, Snowden revealed that No Such Angency intercepted shipments of CISCO routers and swapped out some chips.

Here in Indy we mark a paper ballot then feed it into a reader. So there is a hard copy original ballot.


25 posted on 08/25/2016 11:21:51 AM PDT by AFreeBird (BEST. ELECTION. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

The paper ballots are never officially recounted unless the election is within a small fraction, set by state law.

Presumably, volunteers can recount the ballots. Such was done in 2000 Gore V. Bush but the leftist reporters found that Bush had won by a larger margin and promptly dropped it.

Here is the latest scam where paper ballot verification would be near impossible:

It has been reported in social media (but not yet verified) Reddit and Facebook that Seth Rich was murdered because he had uncovered that Sanders had won in VA outside DC but that Sanders was defrauded by fake polling stations where democrats for Hillary voted, but where the votes were carriedafter the fake location was closed by a few Hillary operatives to official polling stations listed on the SOS webpage and where the votes from the fake polling stations were swapped out in place of votes made at legitimate polling places. The people who voted at the fake polling stations were presumably clueless.

The story has credibility because it was reported by several people that Hillary’s primary campaign webpage gave directions to voters to vote at polling locations that were NOT on the official SOS webpage as approved polling stations.

Such voters could easily have been duped, reported to a location and voted without knowing the polling stations were fake. Poll volunteers could have easily thought they were performing a legitimate role for the primary campaign.

In this manner, Sanders voters would be cut out and replaced by Hillary voters, there would be no danger of a district showing too many votes, more than were registered. Hillary operatives would have legitimate vote ballots taken from an unofficial location and the crime would be to easily replace a bag of votes taken at a legitimate polling station with one taken from a fraudulent station. The sign-in sheets could also be swapped. There might possibly be a problem in initials of official poll workers on bag labels or sign-in sheets but in terms of fraud, it would be very very difficult to prove or catch in the act.

Paper ballots have no identifying information, thus such a scheme would leave no means of verification of the original vote.


26 posted on 08/25/2016 2:18:01 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

I’ll take a double serving of that.


27 posted on 08/25/2016 2:25:42 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

He was great! FARAGE did it and SO CAN WE!!

Go TRUMP
MAKE AMERICA GREAT, AGAIN!


28 posted on 08/25/2016 2:59:42 PM PDT by V K Lee (u TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP to TRIUMPH Follow the lead MAKE AMERICA GREAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Great points, Hostage. People just don’t want to take the time to believe that it is happening. Much easier to say, ‘Too bad. We lost,’ and not have to think about it.


29 posted on 08/25/2016 7:14:53 PM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Free Bird, the reader is where the fraud happens. It changes the votes but there is no hard copy of who voted or how, just totals... Easily hacked.


30 posted on 08/25/2016 7:16:14 PM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson