[AndyTheBear]

There is more than anecdotal evidence that Trump consistently has large rallies and Clinton does not. An obvious inference is that Trump has far more supporters who are enthusiastic enough to attend rallies, and thus likely has more enthusiasm in the voting public at large. Granted this does not mean he will win on election day. Its possible that Clinton could get more votes, albeit fewer enthusiastic ones. But there is no point in calling the enthusiasm gap anecdotal. It is very real and obvious. How much this enthusiasm gap is baked into the poll sampling methodologies or how much it will effect the actual election I am not sure. My suspicion is that the pollsters are not accounting for it because its hard to quantify.

[arthurus]

Clinton has one large advantage that can counter a lot of enthusiasm. That is the Democrat/Clinton/Obama vote fabrication machine. Controlling the voting machines is terribly easy and con be done in large groups not to mention that a George Soros company is in charge of counting the votes for 11 states including FL and NY. Then there are the more traditional methods like multiple voting and dead men voting and found votes, etc.