I see a couple of real dangers with this focus on Hillary’s health.
First, it puts the issue on whether she has the “fitness” to serve, rather than on profound philosophical and policy differences between Hillary and the Leftists and Trump and a free market/pro-America platform. In this light, if she can reassure voters that she’s fit to serve, we’re in trouble, in part because the focus on health suggests that there aren’t important more substantive reasons to go with Trump instead.
Second, this is setting up perfectly a set of low expectations for Hillary heading into the debates. If she merely has the stamina to survive them, let alone spar well against Trump, again we are in trouble.
I think it is okay as a line of questioning in the background, but political positions and the future of the country have to be at the forefront of the political debate or I think we are setting ourselves up for trouble.
Hillary is a pathological liar so her “political positions” are irrelevant.
Debating Hillary is like wrestling with a pig—you just end up full of mud and the pig loves it.