Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fhios
It’s not a terrible idea. Have an oddball shooting, caught with inactive camera, get police carry rights revoked for a year or so. No review, no appeal, automatic.

1. What is an oddball shooting?
2. Cameras can't malfunction?
3. Police carry rights revoked based on the above?
4. No review?
5. No appeal?
6. Automatic?

If you want to address what an officer has done and advocate for suspension or him being fired, I'm all for it.

If the circumstances warrant, he should be pulled off the street pending an investigation. He shouldn't unilaterally have any rights removed until it has been proven he did something outside the law.

After a review, if he has been deemed to be guilty of an infraction, then fire him, and take any legal actions needed.

You probably meant him to be fired, but you stated only to have his carry rights removed. That could leave him in the field unarmed.

If he's still out there, he needs to be armed.

26 posted on 08/22/2016 11:31:58 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
You probably meant him to be fired, but you stated only to have his carry rights removed. That could leave him in the field unarmed. No, I don't mean fired. Reserve that for egregious incidents. Like the dude in South Carolina shooting the 50 year old overweight black dude in the back. If he wasn't caught on film he would have got off because of the deference given to cops in the line of duty.
28 posted on 08/22/2016 12:20:54 PM PDT by Fhios (Progressives just don't know when to stop digging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson