Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomPoster; henkster

I am not a fool. We all know that the “charity” was nothing more than a bribery scheme. However, people have forgotten that it is called a charity and it is set up as such with the IRS. Donors deduct their taxes for money provided and the brochures talk about helping the needy.

We must frame the narrative about the “charity” in this manner because people hate charity scams. Tap into that and people will be disgusted just like we were when we saw Clinton Cash. That is why nobody mentioned their “charity” during the DNC convention - they have done everything to avoid it and the media has obeyed their masters, but we should talk non-stop about ten cents on the dollar. We should ask people why a charity that proclaims that donations go “directly to our life changing work” (taken directly from their site and brochure) spends more on travel for Billary and Chelsea than they provide the poor for whom the “money was donated.” This resonates with people and it is why her campaign has hidden it - they know it looks awful and people understand charity fraud.


51 posted on 08/21/2016 7:29:05 AM PDT by volunbeer (Clinton Cash = Proof of Corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: volunbeer
You nailed it, volunbeer. Charity fraud resonates.

Focus on the charity aspect of this "foundation". That's the ticket. 9 cents out of every dollar does not go to charity.

The Foundation was the only supposed positive thing in Hillary's past that got zero attention to the DNC.

53 posted on 08/21/2016 7:47:05 AM PDT by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson