Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In-person voting fraud is rare, doesn't affect elections
Associated Press ^ | Aug. 20, 2016 2:50 AM EDT | Hope Yen

Posted on 08/20/2016 2:25:04 AM PDT by Olog-hai

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Olog-hai

In the 1950s my father was a NYPD Lieutenant in New York City, he was also a Democrat, and a appointed ‘Poll Watcher’. After election after election,of seeing the Democrat Party stuff box after box with names of democrats that failed to show up and vote, he became a Republican. Also, he was to deliver those boxes to be counted, funny thing is, some of those boxes would fall into the east river. Yeah, voter fraud is rare....My father would laugh,


41 posted on 08/20/2016 6:50:40 AM PDT by heights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Democrats call it a “a little bit of voter fraud”. To MY mind, that’s very much like being “a little bit” pregnant.


42 posted on 08/20/2016 6:52:07 AM PDT by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Geez. You don’t need in-person voting fraud when Democrats can simply hack voting machines, fill in a number of punch-card ballots ahead of time or stuff ballots with vote-by-mail fraud because these Dems *are* the watchdogs that are supposed to catch the fraud which is why it is so easy for them to do it and get away with it.

Let’s remember Palm Beach County FL 2000. Mysteriously, thousands of votes showed up for Pat Buchanan in Palm Beach County (something even Buchanan himself thought was outlandish) and the Dems had to invent a cover story.

At 7 pm ET (an hour before polls closed), they organized a bunch of grannies to parade in front of the media to publicly profess they were TOO STUPID to correctly read a butterfly ballot. The liberal media gave them plenty of face time.

Now, this was BEFORE the polls closed so nobody knew yet what the results would be (allegedly), but here was a DNC astroturf campaign to plant the cover story for obvious vote fraud.

So, how did the Dems know that their vote fraud had gone wrong? Theresa LePore, the elections chief of Palm Beach County, had switched Al Gore’s place on the ballot with Pat Buchanan’s weeks before early voting began. Also, a Democrat was stopped and found to have a voting machine and hundreds of blank computer ballots in her trunk.

Connect the dots. Florida Democrats generated thousands of votes for Pat Buchanan accidentally when they thought Gore was computer hole #5 on the ballot only later to find out it had been changed to computer hole #4 on the ballot. When the bad news made its way up to DNC Headquarters in Washington, they redirected important get-out-the-vote resources for other states in order to find the confused grannies in Florida that had already voted (and were demanding to vote again) so as to give legs to the alibi as to why Buchanan could perform so well in heavily-Jewish Palm Beach.

All the facts are verifiable through liberal news stories, just not with the dots connected as you see it here.

And Bush wound up winning Florida by how many votes? Had those fraud votes gone to Gore rather than Buchanan, history would have changed. No wonder liberals were so angry. They had rigged the outcome and STILL lost the election.

And still some folks refuse to believe in God. Should Donald Trump win this time, it will only be for one reason - that God befuddled lying cheating Democrats again as He did in 2000.

In-person vote fraud is for amateurs. The pros know how to generate far more fake votes without their own fingerprints being visible. the very fact AP is putting out another cover story is proof the Dems are leaving nothing to chance.


43 posted on 08/20/2016 6:53:45 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (With what can already be proved, how can you trust Hillary as POTUS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Hmmm. Guess they missed the Hamilton County Ohio election official convicted of voting 6 or 7 times in 2012 for Obama.


44 posted on 08/20/2016 6:55:34 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Key words here are “in-person”, which tells me they have other ways to cheat.


45 posted on 08/20/2016 7:04:19 AM PDT by 38special (For real, y'all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

They need more ID to board a commercial airplane than they do to vote.


46 posted on 08/20/2016 7:04:42 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (With what can already be proved, how can you trust Hillary as POTUS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What the AP story doesn’t mention: their purported expert, Lorraine Minnite, is an on-record Obama donor and Dem Party partisan.


47 posted on 08/20/2016 7:40:03 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Misnistry of Propaganda is working just a little too hard to make it appear that there is not voter fraud taking place.

Pieces like this make me more convinced than ever that they are working to elect SWMNBP, by any means necessary.


48 posted on 08/20/2016 7:57:05 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Mz. Yen is too young to remember and too dumb to look it up and Director Rehill is too biased to admit Box 13 changed history.


49 posted on 08/20/2016 8:00:03 AM PDT by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Straw man. Most of the fraud is not in person.


50 posted on 08/20/2016 8:04:29 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

There probably hasn’t been an honest election since 1988, or perhaps 1962. Yet they assure us there is no problem, and no influence, of in-person voter fraud.


51 posted on 08/20/2016 8:07:10 AM PDT by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
While fraud can occur, the number of cases is very small

If poll workers are prevented by law from asking for ID, how on earth could they possibly know how much fraud is going on?

52 posted on 08/20/2016 8:15:25 AM PDT by Lizavetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Voting fraud is not a problem. Yeh that’s the ticket. :-)


53 posted on 08/20/2016 8:16:59 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sooth2222

Exactly right.


54 posted on 08/20/2016 8:19:17 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Clearly this a_hole has never voted at any location in MD...


55 posted on 08/20/2016 11:19:57 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pieceofthepuzzle

Daley held back the Chicago vote until late the next morning.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Even if Illinois election results were fraudulent, it did not give the presidency to Kennedy. Take Illinois electoral votes from Kennedy and give them to Nixon and Kennedy still wins the presidency.


56 posted on 08/20/2016 12:53:16 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

“Even if Illinois election results were fraudulent, it did not give the presidency to Kennedy. Take Illinois electoral votes from Kennedy and give them to Nixon and Kennedy still wins the presidency.”

Yes, you are correct, but my point was that fraud does occur, without question. There were also questions about fraud in Texas that year - being LBJ territory. If Nixon had won Texas and Illinois he would have made 270 and won the Presidency. The popular vote difference that election was 119,450 for the entire US. No one, even you and I, knows exactly what happened that year, but IMHO to dismiss the possibility of voting irregularities determining major elections would be a mistake.


57 posted on 08/20/2016 3:05:02 PM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson