Psychopaths do not acknowledge ethics in this world. The concept is meaningless to them and their agendas.
Why isn’t she in prison??????
Anyone of the rest of us would be in prison, if not worse, for doing the things she did to line her pockets and sell out her coutry.
Hillary is a horrible excuse for a human being, let alone an American!
How any true American could stay home, let alone vote for this ghastly woman is just mind boggling. This carpet-munching weirdo is far beneath Donald Trump in any category!
If, thanks be to Satan, she is indeed propelled into the oval orifice which was disgraced by the syphilitic ass she’s welded to, then goodbye America!
Maybe not all the press is in the tank
Unfair? What a steamin' pile.
she has the ethics of Jezebel.. The wicked witch of the west.
The purpose of the Clinton Foundation is to leverage Clinton fame into charitable donations.
Allow me to correct this sentence for the author:
The purpose of the Clinton Foundation is to leverage Clinton influence into Clinton wealth. A key correction because there is nothing charitable about this. It simply makes “donors” feel/look better about the bribe and they can write it off on their taxes.
This is good work if you can get it.....
Article Started off okay then jumped the tracks, through te weeds and over the embankment.
“And it is true that left-wing activists distrust Clinton’s centrist impulses.”
Bwahahaha
Clinton and “ethics” in the same sentence does not compute.
5.56mm
No it doesn't.
IIRC something like only 10% of the donations actually go to charity. And the organizations that give grades to charities give the Clinton foundation a very low grade.
...”The purpose of the Clinton Foundation is to leverage Clinton fame into charitable donations”....
Well it’s much more than just that IMO. There’s a lot of hands in that pie though Clintons basically control it.
But the Foundation is tied up with International NGO’s of various sorts...it’s all used as a slush fund and leveraging whatever they want to use it for. ...it travels the same circut lines.
Ethics are for the little people.
Lax? Is that the Politically Correct way of saying the woman was reckless to a fault about the security of her country? Hillary is/was not only foolhardy to the extreme she lied about her thoughtless negligence to the world. She has lied her way through the last 33+ years and probably before that...she had passed the Arkansas bar exam, she had failed the one in Washington — a piece of information that wasn't publicly revealed until thirty years later.......Never trust a person who has lied to you twice...the first time was a warning and the second time a lesson that there would never be a third time. Hillary Clinton is not in anyway, shape or form trustworthy...she is not worthy of a seat on the town council let alone as POTUS. AND as a Socialist/Marxist Hillary will not obey the US Constitution.
Lax? Is that the Politically Correct way of saying the woman was reckless to a fault about the security of her country? Hillary is/was not only foolhardy to the extreme she lied about her thoughtless negligence to the world. She has lied her way through the last 33+ years and probably before that...she had passed the Arkansas bar exam, she had failed the one in Washington — a piece of information that wasn't publicly revealed until thirty years later.......Never trust a person who has lied to you twice...the first time was a warning and the second time a lesson that there would never be a third time. Hillary Clinton is not in anyway, shape or form trustworthy...she is not worthy of a seat on the town council let alone as POTUS. AND as a Socialist/Marxist Hillary will not obey the US Constitution....she is above that document and its laws.....
I like how Chait mis-characterizes the purpose of the Clinton Foundation nee. Crime Syndicate. It was certainly never to provide charity but rather jobs and sinecures for the Clinton Crime Family and all it’s hangers on.
How many of us would pay Chelsea Clinton $950,000 per year for anything? What justifies that salary?
What a putz.
Well written...more substance than the usual criticisms...
“That purpose has important positive effects — shaking loose donations for AIDS prevention and training African farmers and other worthy causes.”
Uh,yeah that WOULD have been “worthy” if 94% of the money hadn’t gone to “employees”, travel, “training”, other expenses, leaving only 6% for donations.