>
she will have to swear under oath to their truth and accuracy. Not that swearing to anything means much to her. BUT it could conceivably catch her in a web.
>
She was ‘caught’, red-handed, numerous times already...How’d that work out?
Your original comment was that her being ordered to respond to interrogatories vs. sitting for a deposition was worthless. I merely noted that interrogatory responses must be signed under oath.
Your more recent comment about her being caught “red-handed” without consequences affirms the appropriateness of the decision to go with only written interrogatories, as lying in either an interrogatory or deposition makes no difference to Hillary!