Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1100/RR1140/RAND_RR1140.pdf
1 posted on 08/17/2016 4:07:52 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

“Rock the world economy” is a grave understatement.

A war with China would soon go nuclear and that would be it... for everything!


2 posted on 08/17/2016 4:12:31 AM PDT by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The only way the media will allow the United States to fight a long war would be if the United States was fighting Conservatives and Christians.


6 posted on 08/17/2016 4:23:22 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

All of this happening right under Obama’s nose. And don’t forget all the islands China has built. They’re there for a reason.


7 posted on 08/17/2016 4:35:50 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The big question is what will Russia do? Maybe launch a full scale offensive into the Ukraine? We will be faced with a two front war then. Iran might join in as well and invade Saudi Arabia via Iraq which will probably be their ally. Yes, this situation will go nuclear quickly.


10 posted on 08/17/2016 4:53:24 AM PDT by Eternal_Bear (h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is “never get involved in a land war in Asia” - but only slightly less well-known is this: “Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!”

I think we need to listen to Vizzini on this one.
We could take China at sea, but we would find out, the hard way, if their Ballistic Anti-Ship Missile worked.
And we completely lose a land war against China.


13 posted on 08/17/2016 5:55:06 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
War with China = Massive Free Trader necktie party.

Globalist free trader types better pick where and with whom their allegiance lies.

14 posted on 08/17/2016 6:24:06 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I guess this falls into the realm of war is bad.


16 posted on 08/17/2016 6:31:20 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Who needs nukes when they’ve got almost 2 billion people? They can just overrun us. Or somewhere else first, and then us.

Numbers, not nukes. The mother of all weapons is the mother.


17 posted on 08/17/2016 6:33:32 AM PDT by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

With a real Commander-in-Chief it would last about four hours and China’s population problem would be lessened.


21 posted on 08/17/2016 7:38:59 AM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The lesson of Red Dawn: They have more soldiers. We have more bullets.


22 posted on 08/17/2016 7:40:19 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson