Posted on 08/17/2016 3:34:43 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
A SeaRAM launcher at the Raytheon Louisville, Ky. plant. Raytheon Photo
LOUISVILLE, KY. – The Navy is considering expanding the number of SeaRAM installations on its ships beyond a quartet of ballistic missile defense ships based in Spain and Littoral Combat Ships, a service official told USNI News on Tuesday.
“Internally to the Navy there are trade studies going on to look at where to place SeaRAM on different ship classes,” Capt. Craig Bowden with Program Executive Office Integrated Warfare Systems said.
While no decisions have been made, the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations assessment arm (OPNAV 81) is in the midst of the look on which ships it could add the system designed to intercept and destroy incoming cruise and anti-ship missiles.
Officials with SeaRAM manufacturer Raytheon told reporters on Monday the company was in talks with the service to add the 11 missile system to additional guided missile destroyers beyond the Rota quartet.
The systems were earmarked for the Rota DDGs specifically to counter a Russian cruise missile threat that emerged in the Mediterranean region following Moscow’s seizure of Crimea and escalating tensions with the West, several service sources have told USNI News. Neither Raytheon nor Bowden would provide additional details on the threat.
While the Rota destroyers are equipped with the Aegis combat system designed to intercept air and cruise missile threats with its SM-2 missiles, the ships can’t use the system against traditional air threats while set to look for ballistic missile threats.
USS Porter (DDG 78) conducts a structural test firing of SeaRAM in Spain on Feb. 28, 2016, as the first Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer with a SeaRAM installation. US Navy photo.
“We put [the ships] out there by themselves, and they’re putting all their radar energy up in space, they’re tracking space objects now, and you have to wonder, hey, can they defend themselves?,” PEO IWS Rear Adm. Jon Hill told USNI News last year.
The vulnerability prompted U.S. 6th Fleet and OPNAV to push for the installation of the SeaRAM on the Rota ships for an added layer of protection via an urgent operational request.
“Things heated up in the Eastern Mediterranean and suddenly there’s a capability… the adversary changed and became a bigger problem,” Rick McDonnell, Raytheon program directors for close-in weapon systems told reporters. “Speed to deploy was going to be a big part of the issue.”
The Navy elected to replace one of two Phalanx close-in weapon systems on the DDGs with the SeaRAM system.
The two systems are 85 percent common and similar enough in weight not to prompt additional strengthening of the hull of the ships.
The addition creates an additional layer of defense for the destroyers between the long range of the SM-2s and the only mile or so range of the Phalanx’s gun, Bowden said.
“The Standard Missile is a great missile but it’s designed for threats that are farther away from the ship, They really didn’t have anything … for the 3 to 6 mile a defensive bubble around the ship,” he said.
In addition to BMD protection in Europe, the Navy also conducts BMD patrols with single destroyers in the Western Pacific with the same inherent vulnerability as the Rota destroyers.
While the service’s latest Baseline 9 Aegis system is able to track and intercept traditional air and ballistic missile defense targets at the same time, Raytheon officials said the Navy was considering including the systems on the newer ships.
The SeaRAMs are also fielded on the Independence-class LCS and will be included on the Lockheed Martin Freedom-class LCS starting with the LCS 17.
Well, if they are NOT thinking about this kind of change, they should be fired.
Now, about the idiots who them INTO the situation like this .....
Since WWII, a single hit on every destroyer-sized ship has resulted in that ship losing command, control (power, propulsion, steering), communications, weapons (or all of them) for periods of 2 hours up to years. Even dud weapons put a ship out of action: Unable to fight, flee, or even turn the lights on.
We used to brag of wooden ships and iron men.
Today? Tin boats and wimpy admirals.
These are cool and great protection. But for my money, for shear coolness, you can’t beat the phalanx system ripping rounds out so fast you can’t hear individual rounds. Close in? Yes. Searam would be better. But I personally love The Gun better.
When it was first fielded the joke in the Navy was that CIWS stood for “Christ It Won’t Shoot.” It has gotten better since then.
Nothing like ripping rounds down range.
Popped a load of em down range yesterday from such far removed weapons as a 1882 vintage Winchester model 1873 and a 1943 vintage Garand. A 1944 vintage 1911A1 and a 1961 vintage Colt SAA.
I hear they are even working on a laser version where they replace the Gatling gun with a solid state laser array. Maybe even more effective, and lasers are techno-cool in their own way...but then we won't have flying brass/lead or missiles... just a loud hum and a puff of smoke on the horizon. That's hardly satisfying.
It’s always satisfying when you destroy the enemy.
Satisfying? Screw THAT! Just what in the hell is your objective sir?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.