Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thouworm
Between November 8, 2016 and December 19, 2016 there is no "President-elect", because the Electoral College has not met and voted. Realistically, if the "winner" died before December 19, the DNC or the RNC would issue instructions to their chosen electors about what to do. If the "winner" did NOT die, but (let's say, for example) was indicted for racketeering, bribery, tax evasion, money laundering and conspiracy, I don't know what would happen.

After December 19 and before January 3, there will be a President-elect and if he/she died, the Vice-President elect would become President-elect.

For those with tinfoil hats looking for loopholes, consider this language:

"or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

So, the Constitution presumes a situation wherein the Electoral College meets, votes, someone has a majority but "fails to qualify". It also provides for a situation wherein BOTH the President-elect AND VP-elect "fail to qualify", in which scenario Congress appoints the acting President OR "declares "the manner in which" the acting President shall be selected.

I suppose the election of a 34-year old would meet these criteria, the VP-elect would serve as President until the President-Elect's 35th birthday.

But the other two qualifications - natural-born citizenship and 14 years residence - can't be used in this way, and it's a lot of verbiage to cover a birthday.

So, what about it FReepers? Are there other ways a President and Vice-President Elect could "fail to qualify"? Can Congress declare "failure to qualify" and ask the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or Black Lives Matter, to choose the President?

60 posted on 08/18/2016 4:30:41 AM PDT by Jim Noble (The polls can have a strong influence on the weak-minded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble; LucyT; Whenifhow

Thank you Jim Noble

Ping to Presidental election what-ifs...

posts 39, 45, 59, 60


61 posted on 08/18/2016 2:08:21 PM PDT by thouworm ("To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth"---Theodore Roosevelt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble; LucyT
I have been re-posting this for a few years now. There are a few issues here. The first is that the two political parties are private clubs. They have nothing to do with the process other than choosing a candidate. Now here is where it gets sticky. The political parties now combine the presidential candidate and vice presidential candidate. So technically there is no VP elect as there used to be when this amendment was written. So if something were to happen after the electoral vote then the "next person" who received the most electoral votes becomes president elect.

I would submit that you can't have a second person who receives the same number of votes. Meaning the VP on the ticket does not hold the 270 votes needed just because the presidential candidate dropped dead, for instance failing to qualify. There is no succession of officers who have not yet taken the office for which they seek. It clearly states "until a president shall qualify." Anyway the rest is from my earlier post.

The electors DO NOT QUALIFY CANDIDATES!

I have been on this 20th amendment thing since Oct 2008! Anyway I came across this old post. I never did get a response....

I came across this page a while ago and after reading the Q&A's I decided to email the person giving the answers. I have yet to receive a reply.

From that page the first question is;

Question:

What happens if the President-elect fails to qualify before inauguration?
Answer:
If the President-elect fails to qualify before inauguration, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment states that the Vice President-elect will act as President until such a time as a President has qualified.
Then further down on that page is another question.

Question:

Who verifies if a candidate is qualified to run for President?
Answer:
The Office of the Federal Register at the National Archives and Records Administration administers the Electoral College process, which takes place after the November general election. The Office of the Federal Register does not have the authority to handle issues related to the general election, such as candidate qualifications. People interested in this issue may wish to contact their state election officials or their Congressional Representatives.

In light of this answer I emailed the contact for that page the following.

From: Greg XXXXXXX
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 3:23 PM
To: 'electoral_college@nara.gov'
Subject: US Code 3

On this page "Previous Questions of The Week." here http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/previous_questions.html

There are two questions I would like to address, the First one is "What happens if the President-elect fails to qualify before inauguration?" And the answer is correct as it states the process described in the 20th amendment and US Code 3 Sec 19. US Code 3 describes the process of counting the electoral vote for President and Vice President during a joint session of congress.

Then a subsequent question "Who verifies if a candidate is qualified to run for President?" That answer is not very specific. You mention the Office of Federal Register at the National Archives but go on to state it is a states issue. Well in section 11 we see the first mention of the Archivist. But there are three other copies of the certificates, one set being delivered to the President of the Senate. Then is section 15 we see that two tellers from each house previously selected and are handed the certificates for opening and are dealt with in an alphabetical order. It goes on to explain and clarify the counting process.

The word qualify does not appear until section 19 when it mentions the President "elect." This is because we have determined who the President and Vice President elect are. That is the point where qualifications are to be handled. In fact section 19 describes every different situation where someone other than the President elect would assume to act as President and in each case it also declares that that person needs to be "qualified". It is mentioned "nine" times! Now how can one think that any other person or body be responsible for seeing that in these different situations involving the qualification of the President and Vice President elect, or any of the other situation listed, be handled by but Congress?

I think there should be transcripts of some past joint sessions where eligibility is discussed. IE Chester Arthur for instance or maybe perhaps President number 10, John Tyler, who was one of the first NBC Presidents.

3 U.S. Code Chapter 1 - PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES

So there is the process listed. Why and when did Congress start stopping at section 15?

52 posted on 11/02/2014 9:04:56 AM PST by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)

67 posted on 08/19/2016 8:57:20 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson